Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung WB30F
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
96 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Launched January 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung WB30F Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Ricoh CX2 versus Samsung WB30F, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and WB30F (16MP) but they come with the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe CX2 was revealed 4 years earlier than the WB30F and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a in depth comparison, below is a brief summation of how the CX2 grades vs the WB30F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh CX2 & Samsung WB30F. The full galleries are available at Ricoh CX2 Gallery & Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Samsung WB30F
| CX2 | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Ricoh CX2
| WB30F | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | August 2009 | Fresher by 41 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Samsung WB30F
| CX2 | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither comes with Touch display |
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX2 comes with external measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) and the Samsung WB30F has sizing of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh CX2 versus Samsung WB30F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the CX2 against the WB30F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the CX2 and WB30F is 93 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to see the difference in sensor sizing purely by going through technical specs. The graphic below might offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the CX2 and WB30F.
As you have seen, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Samsung WB30F to produce extra detail because of its extra 7MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images much more aggressively. The older CX2 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
| Ricoh CX2 | Samsung WB30F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh CX2 | Samsung WB30F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-08-20 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m (ISO 400) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 185 gr (0.41 lbs) | 128 gr (0.28 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | DB-70 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $341 | $180 |