Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung WB35F
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced January 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Ricoh CX2 versus Samsung WB35F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and WB35F (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe CX2 was revealed 5 years earlier than the WB35F which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the CX2 scores vs the WB35F for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh CX2 & Samsung WB35F. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh CX2 Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Samsung WB35F
| CX2 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Ricoh CX2
| WB35F | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 |  | August 2009 | More modern by 53 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Samsung WB35F
| CX2 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Ricoh CX2 features physical measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has measurements of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh CX2 versus Samsung WB35F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is a front view scale comparison of the CX2 compared to the WB35F.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the CX2 and WB35F is 93 and 93 respectively.
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizes just by reading a spec sheet. The image underneath might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the CX2 and WB35F.
Clearly, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can anticipate the Samsung WB35F to deliver extra detail because of its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images more aggressively. The more aged CX2 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Ricoh CX2 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Ricoh CX2 | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh CX2 | Samsung WB35F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-08-20 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m (ISO 400) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 185 gr (0.41 lb) | 194 gr (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | DB-70 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $341 | $130 |
