Clicky

Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma SD10

Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
35
Overall
33
Ricoh CX2 front
 
Sigma SD10 front
Portability
54
Imaging
39
Features
27
Overall
34

Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma SD10 Key Specs

Ricoh CX2
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
  • Released August 2009
Sigma SD10
(Full Review)
  • 3MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 800 (Increase to 1600)
  • 1/6000s Max Shutter
  • No Video
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
  • Announced March 2004
  • Earlier Model is Sigma SD9
  • Refreshed by Sigma SD14
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma SD10 Overview

Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Ricoh CX2 and Sigma SD10, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Ricoh and Sigma. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and SD10 (3MP) and the CX2 (1/2.3") and SD10 (APS-C) offer different sensor sizing.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The CX2 was manufactured 5 years later than the SD10 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a short view of how the CX2 matches up vs the SD10 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Sigma SD10

 CX2 SD10 
AnnouncedAugust 2009March 2004More recent by 66 months
Screen dimensions3"1.8"Bigger screen (+1.2")
Screen resolution920k130kSharper screen (+790k dot)

Reasons to pick Sigma SD10 over the Ricoh CX2

 SD10 CX2 

Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Sigma SD10

 CX2 SD10 
Focus manually Dial accurate focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither has Touch friendly screen

Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma SD10 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh CX2 has outer dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) while the Sigma SD10 has dimensions of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") and a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).

See the Ricoh CX2 and Sigma SD10 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have at the time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the CX2 vs the SD10.

Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma SD10 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the CX2 and SD10 is 93 and 54 respectively.

Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma SD10 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma SD10 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it's hard to picture the contrast in sensor measurements simply by checking out specs. The visual below may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX2 and SD10.

As you can plainly see, both the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The CX2 because of its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Ricoh CX2 will provide extra detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs more aggressively. The fresher CX2 provides an edge in sensor tech.

Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma SD10 sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma SD10 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma SD10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Portrait photography info
Sigma SD10 Portrait photography info
25
manual focus
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
low resolution sensor (9MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
47
focusing manually
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
no liveview feature
sensor resolution low (3MP)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Street photography information
Sigma SD10 Street photography information
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (185 grams)
screen is fixed
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
43
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
more heavy than competition in class (950g)
low maximum ISO (800)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Sports photography advice
Sigma SD10 Sports photography advice
26
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
low resolution sensor (9MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
36
high shutter speed (1/6,000 seconds)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
no liveview feature
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (3MP)
no phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Ricoh CX2
Travel photography with Sigma SD10
66
lighter than average in class (185 grams)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
long reach (300mm)
low resolution sensor (9MP)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
29
missing Timelapse function
more heavy than competition in class (950 grams)
sensor resolution low (3MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh CX2 as a Landscape photography camera
Sigma SD10 as a Landscape photography camera
42
manual focus
reasonably wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not possible
low resolution sensor (9 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
41
focusing manually
swap lenses (Sigma SA mount)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
screen is small (1.8")
no liveview feature
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (3MP)
low maximum ISO (800)
missing Timelapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Vlogging factors
Sigma SD10 Vlogging factors
30
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (185 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have microphone support
9
can't shoot video
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma SD10 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX2 and Sigma SD10
 Ricoh CX2Sigma SD10
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Sigma
Model type Ricoh CX2 Sigma SD10
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced DSLR
Released 2009-08-20 2004-03-19
Body design Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 20.7 x 13.8mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 285.7mm²
Sensor resolution 9MP 3MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 3:2
Highest resolution 3456 x 2592 2268 x 1512
Highest native ISO 1600 800
Highest boosted ISO - 1600
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens zoom range 28-300mm (10.7x) -
Highest aperture f/3.5-5.6 -
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Available lenses - 76
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.7
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 1.8 inch
Screen resolution 920 thousand dot 130 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 98%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.77x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/6000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.00 m (ISO 400) no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync -
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync - 1/180 secs
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Highest video resolution 640x480 None
Video format Motion JPEG -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 185 gr (0.41 lb) 950 gr (2.09 lb)
Physical dimensions 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID DB-70 -
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) Yes (10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal Compact Flash Type I or II
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $341 $198