Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma SD10
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma SD10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800 (Increase to 1600)
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Announced March 2004
- Earlier Model is Sigma SD9
- Refreshed by Sigma SD14
Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma SD10 Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Ricoh CX2 and Sigma SD10, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Ricoh and Sigma. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and SD10 (3MP) and the CX2 (1/2.3") and SD10 (APS-C) offer different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe CX2 was manufactured 5 years later than the SD10 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a short view of how the CX2 matches up vs the SD10 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma SD10 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh CX2 and Sigma SD10. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh CX2 Gallery and Sigma SD10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Sigma SD10
CX2 | SD10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2009 | March 2004 | More recent by 66 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 130k | Sharper screen (+790k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD10 over the Ricoh CX2
SD10 | CX2 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Sigma SD10
CX2 | SD10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma SD10 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh CX2 has outer dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) while the Sigma SD10 has dimensions of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") and a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
See the Ricoh CX2 and Sigma SD10 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have at the time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the CX2 vs the SD10.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the CX2 and SD10 is 93 and 54 respectively.
Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma SD10 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to picture the contrast in sensor measurements simply by checking out specs. The visual below may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX2 and SD10.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The CX2 because of its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Ricoh CX2 will provide extra detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs more aggressively. The fresher CX2 provides an edge in sensor tech.
Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma SD10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma SD10 Specifications
Ricoh CX2 | Sigma SD10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model type | Ricoh CX2 | Sigma SD10 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2009-08-20 | 2004-03-19 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9MP | 3MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 2268 x 1512 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 1.8 inch |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 130 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m (ISO 400) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 185 gr (0.41 lb) | 950 gr (2.09 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | DB-70 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Compact Flash Type I or II |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $341 | $198 |