Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma Quattro H
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
78 Imaging
72 Features
59 Overall
66
Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched August 2009
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Announced February 2016
Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma Quattro H Overview
Here is a detailed review of the Ricoh CX2 versus Sigma Quattro H, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Ricoh and Sigma. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the CX2 (1/2.3") and Quattro H (APS-H) possess different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe CX2 was announced 7 years prior to the Quattro H and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short summary of how the CX2 scores versus the Quattro H when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma Quattro H Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh CX2 and Sigma sd Quattro H. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh CX2 Gallery and Sigma Quattro H Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Sigma Quattro H
CX2 | Quattro H |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Ricoh CX2
Quattro H | CX2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2016 | August 2009 | Fresher by 79 months | |
Screen resolution | 1620k | 920k | Crisper screen (+700k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Sigma Quattro H
CX2 | Quattro H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh CX2 enjoys external measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) whilst the Sigma Quattro H has measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh CX2 versus Sigma Quattro H in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the CX2 against the Quattro H.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the CX2 and Quattro H is 93 and 78 respectively.
Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing only by checking out a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the CX2 and Quattro H.
Clearly, the two cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The CX2 having a smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh more challenging and the Sigma Quattro H will provide extra detail with its extra 36 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older CX2 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications
Ricoh CX2 | Sigma sd Quattro H | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model type | Ricoh CX2 | Sigma sd Quattro H |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2009-08-20 | 2016-02-23 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-H |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 26.6 x 17.9mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 476.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 45 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 6200 x 4152 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.4 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 1,620 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.8 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m (ISO 400) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | - |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 185 gr (0.41 pounds) | - |
Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | DB-70 | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $341 | $1,134 |