Clicky

Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma Quattro H

Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
35
Overall
33
Ricoh CX2 front
 
Sigma sd Quattro H front
Portability
78
Imaging
72
Features
59
Overall
66

Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs

Ricoh CX2
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
  • Launched August 2009
Sigma Quattro H
(Full Review)
  • 45MP - APS-H Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Announced February 2016
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma Quattro H Overview

Here is a detailed review of the Ricoh CX2 versus Sigma Quattro H, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Ricoh and Sigma. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the CX2 (1/2.3") and Quattro H (APS-H) possess different sensor measurements.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The CX2 was announced 7 years prior to the Quattro H and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short summary of how the CX2 scores versus the Quattro H when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Sigma Quattro H

 CX2 Quattro H 

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Ricoh CX2

 Quattro H CX2 
AnnouncedFebruary 2016August 2009Fresher by 79 months
Screen resolution1620k920kCrisper screen (+700k dot)

Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Sigma Quattro H

 CX2 Quattro H 
Focus manually More accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen measurements
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Missing Touch friendly screen

Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh CX2 enjoys external measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) whilst the Sigma Quattro H has measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Compare the Ricoh CX2 versus Sigma Quattro H in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the CX2 against the Quattro H.

Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma Quattro H size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the CX2 and Quattro H is 93 and 78 respectively.

Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma Quattro H top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing only by checking out a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the CX2 and Quattro H.

Clearly, the two cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The CX2 having a smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh more challenging and the Sigma Quattro H will provide extra detail with its extra 36 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older CX2 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma Quattro H sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Portrait photography info
Sigma Quattro H Portrait photography info
25
has manual focus
no manual mode
no external flash support
megapixel count low (9MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
83
manual focus
great megapixels (45 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-H)
offers face detect focus
saves RAW formats
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh CX2
Street photography with Sigma Quattro H
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (185g)
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
70
sensor size is decent (APS-H)
saves RAW formats
weather sealing
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Sports photography features
Sigma Quattro H Sports photography features
26
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (9MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
71
great megapixels (45MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-H)
offers tracking focus
weather sealing
has phase detect auto focus
very slow continuous shooting (3.8 fps)
does not have image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Travel photography information
Sigma Quattro H Travel photography information
66
lighter than competition in class (185g)
has built in flash
quite wide (28mm)
great zoom (300mm)
megapixel count low (9 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
65
weather sealing
great megapixels (45MP)
no Timelapse mode
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Ricoh CX2
Landscape photography with Sigma Quattro H
42
has manual focus
quite wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
no manual mode
megapixel count low (9 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
75
manual focus
swap lenses (Sigma SA mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
great megapixels (45MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-H)
saves RAW formats
weather sealing
does not have image stabilization
no Timelapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Vlogging information
Sigma Quattro H Vlogging information
30
quite wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (185 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of external mic support
26
offers face detect focus
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video res low ( resolution)
no microphone port
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh CX2 vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX2 and Sigma Quattro H
 Ricoh CX2Sigma sd Quattro H
General Information
Make Ricoh Sigma
Model type Ricoh CX2 Sigma sd Quattro H
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced Mirrorless
Launched 2009-08-20 2016-02-23
Body design Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Smooth Imaging Engine IV Dual TRUE III
Sensor type CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-H
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 26.6 x 17.9mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 476.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixel 45 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3456 x 2592 6200 x 4152
Highest native ISO 1600 6400
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens zoom range 28-300mm (10.7x) -
Max aperture f/3.5-5.6 -
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Total lenses - 76
Crop factor 5.8 1.4
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 920 thousand dot 1,620 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed - 3.8 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.00 m (ISO 400) no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync no built-in flash
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Highest video resolution 640x480 -
Video format Motion JPEG -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 185 gr (0.41 pounds) -
Dimensions 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID DB-70 BP-61
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $341 $1,134