Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A900
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
54 Imaging
66 Features
62 Overall
64
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed August 2009
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
- Released October 2008
- Newer Model is Sony A99
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A900 Overview
Following is a thorough analysis of the Ricoh CX2 and Sony A900, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and A900 (25MP) and the CX2 (1/2.3") and A900 (Full frame) offer totally different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe CX2 was announced 11 months after the A900 which means that they are of a similar age. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera and the Sony A900 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the CX2 grades against the A900 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A900 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh CX2 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A900. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX2 Gallery & Sony A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Sony A900
CX2 | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2009 | October 2008 | More modern by 11 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Ricoh CX2
A900 | CX2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 922k | 920k | Sharper display (+2k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Sony A900
CX2 | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A900 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh CX2 enjoys external dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) and the Sony A900 has specifications of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh CX2 and Sony A900 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the CX2 compared to the A900.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the CX2 and A900 is 93 and 54 respectively.
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A900 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizes simply by checking out technical specs. The picture underneath should offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX2 and A900.
As you have seen, each of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The CX2 having a smaller sensor will make getting bokeh tougher and the Sony A900 will provide extra detail with its extra 16 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The fresher CX2 is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony A900 Specifications
Ricoh CX2 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh CX2 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2009-08-20 | 2008-10-22 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9MP | 25MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 6048 x 4032 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 920k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m (ISO 400) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 185 gr (0.41 pounds) | 895 gr (1.97 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1431 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 880 shots |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB-70 | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
Storage slots | Single | 2 |
Price at launch | $341 | $2,736 |