Ricoh CX2 vs Sony NEX-3N
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
89 Imaging
57 Features
52 Overall
55
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony NEX-3N Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
- Revealed February 2013
- Old Model is Sony NEX-F3
- Newer Model is Sony a5000
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony NEX-3N Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Ricoh CX2 versus Sony NEX-3N, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Ricoh and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and NEX-3N (16MP) and the CX2 (1/2.3") and NEX-3N (APS-C) posses different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe CX2 was manufactured 4 years earlier than the NEX-3N which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-3N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the CX2 scores vs the NEX-3N with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony NEX-3N Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh CX2 & Sony Alpha NEX-3N. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh CX2 Gallery & Sony NEX-3N Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Sony NEX-3N
CX2 | NEX-3N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Ricoh CX2
NEX-3N | CX2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2013 | August 2009 | More modern by 42 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Sony NEX-3N
CX2 | NEX-3N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony NEX-3N Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh CX2 has got exterior dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) while the Sony NEX-3N has measurements of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh CX2 versus Sony NEX-3N in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the CX2 compared to the NEX-3N.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the CX2 and NEX-3N is 93 and 89 respectively.
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony NEX-3N Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizes only by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX2 and NEX-3N.
As you can see, both of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The CX2 because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field tougher and the Sony NEX-3N will deliver extra detail due to its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged CX2 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony NEX-3N Specifications
Ricoh CX2 | Sony Alpha NEX-3N | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh CX2 | Sony Alpha NEX-3N |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2009-08-20 | 2013-02-25 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4912 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 16000 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 4.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m (ISO 400) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 185 gr (0.41 pounds) | 269 gr (0.59 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 74 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1067 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 480 shots |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB-70 | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $341 | $399 |