Ricoh CX2 vs Sony NEX-C3
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
91 Imaging
56 Features
57 Overall
56
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony NEX-C3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
- Launched August 2011
- Succeeded the Sony NEX-3
- New Model is Sony NEX-F3
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony NEX-C3 Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Ricoh CX2 and Sony NEX-C3, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Ricoh and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and NEX-C3 (16MP) and the CX2 (1/2.3") and NEX-C3 (APS-C) boast different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe CX2 was announced 24 months earlier than the NEX-C3 making them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-C3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the CX2 grades vs the NEX-C3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony NEX-C3 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh CX2 and Sony Alpha NEX-C3. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh CX2 Gallery and Sony NEX-C3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Sony NEX-C3
CX2 | NEX-C3 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-C3 over the Ricoh CX2
NEX-C3 | CX2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2011 | August 2009 | More modern by 24 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Sony NEX-C3
CX2 | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display dimensions | |
Display resolution | 920k | 920k | Equal display resolution | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch display | No Touch display |
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony NEX-C3 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh CX2 comes with outer dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-C3 has dimensions of 110mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh CX2 and Sony NEX-C3 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you use during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the CX2 against the NEX-C3.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the CX2 and NEX-C3 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony NEX-C3 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizes only by seeing technical specs. The picture below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX2 and NEX-C3.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The CX2 having a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF tougher and the Sony NEX-C3 will show more detail with its extra 7MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged CX2 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony NEX-C3 Specifications
Ricoh CX2 | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh CX2 | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2009-08-20 | 2011-08-22 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 920k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 6.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m (ISO 400) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 185 grams (0.41 lb) | 225 grams (0.50 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.2 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1083 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB-70 | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $341 | $343 |