Clicky

Ricoh CX2 vs Sony QX1

Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
35
Overall
33
Ricoh CX2 front
 
Sony Alpha QX1 front
Portability
90
Imaging
62
Features
48
Overall
56

Ricoh CX2 vs Sony QX1 Key Specs

Ricoh CX2
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
  • Announced August 2009
Sony QX1
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • " Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
  • Revealed September 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Ricoh CX2 vs Sony QX1 Overview

Following is a thorough overview of the Ricoh CX2 vs Sony QX1, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Lens-style by rivals Ricoh and Sony. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and QX1 (20MP) and the CX2 (1/2.3") and QX1 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor size.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The CX2 was unveiled 6 years prior to the QX1 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera and the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera.

Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the CX2 grades against the QX1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

        

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Sony QX1

 CX2 QX1 
Screen dimensions3""Bigger screen (+3")
Screen resolution920k0kClearer screen (+920k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Ricoh CX2

 QX1 CX2 
RevealedSeptember 2014August 2009More modern by 61 months
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Sony QX1

 CX2 QX1 
Manual focus Dial precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen

Ricoh CX2 vs Sony QX1 Physical Comparison

If you are looking to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX2 has got outside measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) while the Sony QX1 has sizing of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") and a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).

Check out the Ricoh CX2 vs Sony QX1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at the time. The following is a front view size comparison of the CX2 versus the QX1.

Ricoh CX2 vs Sony QX1 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the CX2 and QX1 is 93 and 90 respectively.

Ricoh CX2 vs Sony QX1 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX2 vs Sony QX1 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very tough to envision the gap in sensor sizes simply by researching technical specs. The pic underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the CX2 and QX1.

As you can tell, both cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The CX2 using its smaller sensor will make getting bokeh more difficult and the Sony QX1 will provide you with more detail having an extra 11 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged CX2 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Ricoh CX2 vs Sony QX1 sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX2 vs Sony QX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX2 vs Sony QX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh CX2
Portrait photography with Sony QX1
25
focusing manually
no manual control
external flash not possible
low megapixels (9 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
65
focusing manually
megapixel count decent (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports face detection focusing
saves RAW files
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Street photography highlights
Sony QX1 Street photography highlights
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (185 grams)
no moving screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
69
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
provides touch focus
fixed screen
no image stabilization
heavier than competition (216g)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Ricoh CX2 as a Sports photography camera
Sony QX1 as a Sports photography camera
26
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
low megapixels (9 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
56
megapixel count decent (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
better than average battery (440 per charge)
slow fps (4.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
no phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Ricoh CX2 as a Travel photography camera
Sony QX1 as a Travel photography camera
66
lighter than competitors (185 grams)
built-in flash
really wide (28mm)
very long reach (300mm)
low megapixels (9 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
71
better than average battery (440 shots)
provides touch focus
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
built-in flash
missing Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition (216 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Landscape photography factors
Sony QX1 Landscape photography factors
42
focusing manually
really wide (28mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
no manual control
low megapixels (9MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
63
focusing manually
change lenses (Sony E mount)
megapixel count decent (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
better than average battery (440 CIPA)
screen is small ( inch)
lack of manual exposure
no image stabilization
missing Time Lapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Vlogging information
Sony QX1 Vlogging information
30
really wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (185 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have mic port
32
touchscreen
supports face detection focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
missing external mic port
heavier than competition (216g)
Photography Glossary

Ricoh CX2 vs Sony QX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX2 and Sony QX1
 Ricoh CX2Sony Alpha QX1
General Information
Brand Ricoh Sony
Model Ricoh CX2 Sony Alpha QX1
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Lens-style
Announced 2009-08-20 2014-09-03
Body design Compact Lens-style
Sensor Information
Chip Smooth Imaging Engine IV Bionz X
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.2 x 15.4mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 357.3mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 3:2
Highest resolution 3456 x 2592 5456 x 3632
Highest native ISO 1600 16000
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points - 25
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sony E
Lens focal range 28-300mm (10.7x) -
Max aperture f/3.5-5.6 -
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.6
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches -
Resolution of screen 920k dot 0k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed - 4.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.00 m (ISO 400) 4.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 185 grams (0.41 lbs) 216 grams (0.48 lbs)
Physical dimensions 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 440 photographs
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery model DB-70 NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) Yes (2, 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro
Storage slots One One
Launch price $341 $500