Ricoh CX2 vs Sony QX1
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
90 Imaging
62 Features
48 Overall
56
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony QX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
- Revealed September 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh CX2 vs Sony QX1 Overview
Following is a thorough overview of the Ricoh CX2 vs Sony QX1, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Lens-style by rivals Ricoh and Sony. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and QX1 (20MP) and the CX2 (1/2.3") and QX1 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe CX2 was unveiled 6 years prior to the QX1 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera and the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera.
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the CX2 grades against the QX1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh CX2 vs Sony QX1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh CX2 & Sony Alpha QX1. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX2 Gallery & Sony QX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Sony QX1
| CX2 | QX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" | " | Bigger screen (+3") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 0k | Clearer screen (+920k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Ricoh CX2
| QX1 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 | August 2009 | More modern by 61 months | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Sony QX1
| CX2 | QX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony QX1 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX2 has got outside measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) while the Sony QX1 has sizing of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") and a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh CX2 vs Sony QX1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at the time. The following is a front view size comparison of the CX2 versus the QX1.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the CX2 and QX1 is 93 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony QX1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to envision the gap in sensor sizes simply by researching technical specs. The pic underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the CX2 and QX1.
As you can tell, both cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The CX2 using its smaller sensor will make getting bokeh more difficult and the Sony QX1 will provide you with more detail having an extra 11 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged CX2 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony QX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony QX1 Specifications
| Ricoh CX2 | Sony Alpha QX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model | Ricoh CX2 | Sony Alpha QX1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Lens-style |
| Announced | 2009-08-20 | 2014-09-03 |
| Body design | Compact | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.2 x 15.4mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 357.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 5456 x 3632 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 16000 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | - |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 0k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 4.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m (ISO 400) | 4.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 185 grams (0.41 lbs) | 216 grams (0.48 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 440 photographs |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | DB-70 | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $341 | $500 |