Ricoh CX2 vs Sony HX200V
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33


66 Imaging
42 Features
55 Overall
47
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony HX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed August 2009
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
- Announced May 2012
- Succeeded the Sony HX100V
- Later Model is Sony HX300

Ricoh CX2 vs Sony HX200V Overview
The following is a thorough analysis of the Ricoh CX2 and Sony HX200V, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and HX200V (18MP) but they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").

The CX2 was announced 3 years earlier than the HX200V which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX200V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the CX2 scores against the HX200V with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Ricoh CX2 vs Sony HX200V Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh CX2 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh CX2 Gallery & Sony HX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Sony HX200V
CX2 | HX200V |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Ricoh CX2
HX200V | CX2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | May 2012 | ![]() | August 2009 | Newer by 33 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 920k | Crisper display (+2k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Sony HX200V
CX2 | HX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch display |
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony HX200V Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX2 comes with physical measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) while the Sony HX200V has sizing of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") along with a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh CX2 and Sony HX200V in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the CX2 against the HX200V.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the CX2 and HX200V is 93 and 66 respectively.

Ricoh CX2 vs Sony HX200V Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to envision the difference between sensor dimensions only by going over specifications. The image underneath should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the CX2 and HX200V.
Plainly, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Sony HX200V to offer you more detail with its extra 9MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images much more aggressively. The more aged CX2 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Ricoh CX2 vs Sony HX200V Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh CX2 vs Sony HX200V Specifications
Ricoh CX2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh CX2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-08-20 | 2012-05-11 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9MP | 18MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 27-810mm (30.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m (ISO 400) | 12.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 185 grams (0.41 pounds) | 583 grams (1.29 pounds) |
Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 450 shots |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB-70 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $341 | $480 |