Ricoh CX2 vs Sony HX350
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
62 Imaging
47 Features
51 Overall
48
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony HX350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 652g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
- Introduced December 2016
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh CX2 vs Sony HX350 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Ricoh CX2 vs Sony HX350, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Ricoh and Sony. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and HX350 (20MP) but they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe CX2 was announced 8 years before the HX350 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX350 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a quick summation of how the CX2 scores against the HX350 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Ricoh CX2 vs Sony HX350 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh CX2 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX2 Gallery and Sony HX350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Sony HX350
| CX2 | HX350 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX350 over the Ricoh CX2
| HX350 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | December 2016 |  | August 2009 | Newer by 89 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 920k | Sharper display (+2k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Sony HX350
| CX2 | HX350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony HX350 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera, you should consider its weight and size. The Ricoh CX2 provides physical measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) whilst the Sony HX350 has specifications of 130mm x 93mm x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") and a weight of 652 grams (1.44 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh CX2 vs Sony HX350 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the CX2 against the HX350.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the CX2 and HX350 is 93 and 62 respectively.
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony HX350 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions just by going through specifications. The image here will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the CX2 and HX350.
To sum up, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Sony HX350 to produce greater detail with its extra 11MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged CX2 will be behind in sensor tech.
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony HX350 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony HX350 Specifications
| Ricoh CX2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model | Ricoh CX2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-08-20 | 2016-12-20 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | BIONZ X |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 5184 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/2.8-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 920k dots | 922k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 202k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m (ISO 400) | 8.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, advanced, rear sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 185g (0.41 lb) | 652g (1.44 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 shots |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | DB-70 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $341 | - |
