Ricoh CX2 vs Sony HX99
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
91 Imaging
45 Features
67 Overall
53
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony HX99 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched August 2009
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3-inch Sensor
- 3.00" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.4) lens
- 242g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
- Revealed September 2018
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony HX99 Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Ricoh CX2 vs Sony HX99, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Ricoh and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and HX99 (18MP) and the CX2 (1/2.3") and HX99 (1/2.3-inch) enjoy totally different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe CX2 was unveiled 10 years prior to the HX99 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple summary of how the CX2 scores versus the HX99 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony HX99 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh CX2 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX2 Gallery and Sony HX99 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Sony HX99
CX2 | HX99 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX99 over the Ricoh CX2
HX99 | CX2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2018 | August 2009 | More recent by 109 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 920k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Sony HX99
CX2 | HX99 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3.00" | Identical screen size |
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony HX99 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX2 features physical measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) whilst the Sony HX99 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") with a weight of 242 grams (0.53 lbs).
See the Ricoh CX2 vs Sony HX99 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the CX2 compared to the HX99.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the CX2 and HX99 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony HX99 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to see the difference between sensor measurements merely by checking specs. The graphic here should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the CX2 and HX99.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The CX2 with its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Sony HX99 will resolve extra detail having an extra 9MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older CX2 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony HX99 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony HX99 Specifications
Ricoh CX2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh CX2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2009-08-20 | 2018-09-01 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3-inch |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9MP | 18MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.5-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3.00 inch |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 638 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.5x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m (ISO 400) | 5.40 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash on, slow sync, flash off, rear sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p, 120p) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 185 gr (0.41 lbs) | 242 gr (0.53 lbs) |
Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 360 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB-70 | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $341 | $469 |