Ricoh CX2 vs Sony QX10
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
96 Imaging
42 Features
34 Overall
38
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony QX10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1440 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 105g - 62 x 62 x 33mm
- Released September 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh CX2 vs Sony QX10 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Ricoh CX2 vs Sony QX10, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Lens-style by brands Ricoh and Sony. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and QX10 (18MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe CX2 was released 5 years prior to the QX10 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera and the Sony QX10 being a Lens-style camera.
Before going in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the CX2 scores vs the QX10 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh CX2 vs Sony QX10 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh CX2 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh CX2 Gallery and Sony QX10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Sony QX10
| CX2 | QX10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | " | Bigger screen (+3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 0k | Crisper screen (+920k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX10 over the Ricoh CX2
| QX10 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2013 |  | August 2009 | Fresher by 49 months |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Sony QX10
| CX2 | QX10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony QX10 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh CX2 has physical measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) while the Sony QX10 has dimensions of 62mm x 62mm x 33mm (2.4" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh CX2 vs Sony QX10 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the CX2 against the QX10.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the CX2 and QX10 is 93 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony QX10 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizing purely by viewing specifications. The graphic here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the CX2 and QX10.
To sum up, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You should expect the Sony QX10 to result in greater detail as a result of its extra 9MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older CX2 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony QX10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony QX10 Specifications
| Ricoh CX2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh CX2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Lens-style |
| Introduced | 2009-08-20 | 2013-09-04 |
| Physical type | Compact | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | - |
| Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 0 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | - | Depends on connected smartphone |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m (ISO 400) | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | None |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1440 x 1080 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1440x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 185 gr (0.41 lb) | 105 gr (0.23 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 62 x 62 x 33mm (2.4" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 photos |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | DB-70 | NP-BN, |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $341 | $250 |