Ricoh CX2 vs Sony T900
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Introduced February 2009
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony T900 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Ricoh CX2 and Sony T900, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Sony. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and T900 (12MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe CX2 was released 7 months later than the T900 and they are both of a similar age. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the CX2 scores against the T900 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony T900 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh CX2 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh CX2 Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Sony T900
CX2 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2009 | February 2009 | Fresher by 7 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Ricoh CX2
T900 | CX2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 920k | Sharper screen (+2k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Sony T900
CX2 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh CX2 comes with exterior measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) and the Sony T900 has specifications of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh CX2 and Sony T900 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the CX2 compared to the T900.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the CX2 and T900 is 93 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to envision the gap in sensor sizing just by going through a spec sheet. The photograph here might give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the CX2 and T900.
Clearly, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Sony T900 to produce more detail as a result of its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more modern CX2 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX2 vs Sony T900 Specifications
Ricoh CX2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh CX2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2009-08-20 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.5-10.0 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3.5" |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 2s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m (ISO 400) | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 185 gr (0.41 lb) | 143 gr (0.32 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | DB-70 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $341 | $300 |