Clicky

Ricoh CX2 vs Sony W320

Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
35
Overall
33
Ricoh CX2 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 front
Portability
97
Imaging
36
Features
21
Overall
30

Ricoh CX2 vs Sony W320 Key Specs

Ricoh CX2
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
  • Launched August 2009
Sony W320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
  • 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
  • Released January 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh CX2 vs Sony W320 Overview

Lets look more in depth at the Ricoh CX2 versus Sony W320, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Sony. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the CX2 (9MP) and W320 (14MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The CX2 was released 4 months earlier than the W320 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before we go into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the CX2 scores against the W320 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Sony W320

 CX2 W320 
Manual focus Dial precise focusing
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kCrisper display (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Ricoh CX2

 W320 CX2 

Common features in the Ricoh CX2 and Sony W320

 CX2 W320 
ReleasedAugust 2009January 2010Same age
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

Ricoh CX2 vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to lug around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh CX2 has got exterior dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) while the Sony W320 has dimensions of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") with a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).

See the Ricoh CX2 versus Sony W320 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the CX2 compared to the W320.

Ricoh CX2 vs Sony W320 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the CX2 and W320 is 93 and 97 respectively.

Ricoh CX2 vs Sony W320 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX2 vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it can be hard to visualise the gap in sensor measurements merely by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the CX2 and W320.

As you can see, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Sony W320 to result in more detail as a result of its extra 5MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics more aggressively.

Ricoh CX2 vs Sony W320 sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX2 vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX2 vs Sony W320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Portrait photography features
Sony W320 Portrait photography features
25
you can focus manually
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
low MP (9 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
28
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Street photography features
Sony W320 Street photography features
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (185g)
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
48
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Sports photography details
Sony W320 Sports photography details
26
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
low MP (9 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
26
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
max fps low (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Travel photography factors
Sony W320 Travel photography factors
66
lighter than others in class (185 grams)
has built in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
very long reach (300mm)
low MP (9MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
66
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
built-in flash
rather wide (26mm)
missing Time Lapse function
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.7)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Ricoh CX2
Landscape photography with Sony W320
42
you can focus manually
pretty wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
manual exposure not available
low MP (9MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
33
rather wide (26mm)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.7)
small screen (2.7")
manual exposure not available
does not have image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
missing Time Lapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh CX2 Vlogging advice
Sony W320 Vlogging advice
30
pretty wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (185g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
no mic support
26
rather wide (26mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.7)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
missing external mic socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh CX2 vs Sony W320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX2 and Sony W320
 Ricoh CX2Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Sony
Model type Ricoh CX2 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Ultracompact
Launched 2009-08-20 2010-01-07
Physical type Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3456 x 2592 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-300mm (10.7x) 26-105mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.6 f/2.7-5.7
Macro focusing distance 1cm 4cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 920k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8s 1s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1600s
Continuous shooting rate - 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.00 m (ISO 400) 4.80 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 185g (0.41 lb) 117g (0.26 lb)
Physical dimensions 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID DB-70 NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) Yes (2 sec or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Card slots One One
Price at launch $341 $269