Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched June 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
- Updated by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Let's look more closely at the Ricoh CX3 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof and both are offered by Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the CX3 (10MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe CX3 was manufactured 4 years before the WG-4 GPS and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a concise summation of how the CX3 scores versus the WG-4 GPS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh CX3 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX3 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| CX3 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Ricoh CX3
| WG-4 GPS | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 |  | June 2010 | Fresher by 44 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX3 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| CX3 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Ricoh CX3 offers outside dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check the Ricoh CX3 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the CX3 versus the WG-4 GPS.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the CX3 and WG-4 GPS is 92 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizing just by looking at specs. The graphic underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the CX3 and WG-4 GPS.
All in all, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to resolve greater detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The older CX3 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Ricoh CX3 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Ricoh |
| Model | Ricoh CX3 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 920k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206g (0.45 lbs) | 235g (0.52 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | DB-100 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $329 | $210 |
