Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
90 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed June 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Earlier Model is Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Updated by Ricoh WG-6
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
Below is a in-depth analysis of the Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof and both are offered by Ricoh. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the CX3 (10MP) and WG-5 GPS (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe CX3 was manufactured 5 years prior to the WG-5 GPS and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a brief view of how the CX3 matches up against the WG-5 GPS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh CX3 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh CX3 Gallery and Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| CX3 | WG-5 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Ricoh CX3
| WG-5 GPS | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2015 |  | June 2010 | More recent by 56 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX3 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| CX3 | WG-5 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX3 comes with exterior measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has sizing of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check the Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the CX3 against the WG-5 GPS.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the CX3 and WG-5 GPS is 92 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to visualise the difference between sensor measurements purely by going over specifications. The graphic here will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the CX3 and WG-5 GPS.
Plainly, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to offer you extra detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older CX3 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Ricoh CX3 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
| Ricoh CX3 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Ricoh |
| Model type | Ricoh CX3 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-06-16 | 2015-02-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 14.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206 gr (0.45 lbs) | 236 gr (0.52 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 images |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | DB-100 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $329 | $500 |