Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung GX-1L
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
69 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung GX-1L Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced June 2010
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 570g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Introduced February 2006
Photography Glossary Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung GX-1L Overview
Below is a extended analysis of the Ricoh CX3 and Samsung GX-1L, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the CX3 (10MP) and GX-1L (6MP) and the CX3 (1/2.3") and GX-1L (APS-C) feature totally different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe CX3 was revealed 4 years later than the GX-1L and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-1L being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going through a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief summary of how the CX3 matches up versus the GX-1L with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung GX-1L Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh CX3 & Samsung GX-1L. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX3 Gallery & Samsung GX-1L Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Samsung GX-1L
| CX3 | GX-1L | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2010 |  | February 2006 | More recent by 53 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 210k | Clearer screen (+710k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1L over the Ricoh CX3
| GX-1L | CX3 |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh CX3 and Samsung GX-1L
| CX3 | GX-1L | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung GX-1L Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX3 comes with outside dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung GX-1L has sizing of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 570 grams (1.26 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh CX3 and Samsung GX-1L in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the CX3 vs the GX-1L.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the CX3 and GX-1L is 92 and 69 respectively.
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung GX-1L Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to see the gap between sensor measurements only by reading a spec sheet. The visual underneath might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX3 and GX-1L.
Clearly, both cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The CX3 with its tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF tougher and the Ricoh CX3 will deliver more detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more recent CX3 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung GX-1L Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung GX-1L Specifications
| Ricoh CX3 | Samsung GX-1L | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh CX3 | Samsung GX-1L |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
| Announced | 2010-06-16 | 2006-02-24 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 6MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3008 x 2008 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 200 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 5 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 151 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 920k dots | 210k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 7.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206 gr (0.45 lbs) | 570 gr (1.26 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | DB-100 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/MMC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $329 | $0 |