Clicky

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung NX200

Portability
92
Imaging
33
Features
35
Overall
33
Ricoh CX3 front
 
Samsung NX200 front
Portability
90
Imaging
61
Features
57
Overall
59

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung NX200 Key Specs

Ricoh CX3
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
  • Released June 2010
Samsung NX200
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Samsung NX Mount
  • 223g - 117 x 63 x 36mm
  • Introduced February 2012
  • Succeeded the Samsung NX100
  • Successor is Samsung NX210
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung NX200 Overview

The following is a extensive comparison of the Ricoh CX3 and Samsung NX200, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the CX3 (10MP) and NX200 (20MP) and the CX3 (1/2.3") and NX200 (APS-C) posses different sensor dimensions.

Photography Glossary

The CX3 was introduced 20 months earlier than the NX200 making them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick view of how the CX3 scores versus the NX200 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Samsung NX200

 CX3 NX200 
Display resolution920k614kSharper display (+306k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung NX200 over the Ricoh CX3

 NX200 CX3 
IntroducedFebruary 2012June 2010Newer by 20 months

Common features in the Ricoh CX3 and Samsung NX200

 CX3 NX200 
Manually focus Very accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display sizing
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch display Neither provides Touch display

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung NX200 Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh CX3 provides exterior dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung NX200 has measurements of 117mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs).

See the Ricoh CX3 and Samsung NX200 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select at that moment. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the CX3 vs the NX200.

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung NX200 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the CX3 and NX200 is 92 and 90 respectively.

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung NX200 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung NX200 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be hard to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reviewing specifications. The picture below may give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX3 and NX200.

To sum up, both of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The CX3 with its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Samsung NX200 will deliver more detail using its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos more aggressively. The more aged CX3 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung NX200 sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung NX200 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung NX200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh CX3 Portrait photography details
Samsung NX200 Portrait photography details
26
you can focus manually
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
megapixel count low (10MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
76
manual focus
good MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
comes with face detection focusing
delivers RAW formats
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh CX3
Street photography with Samsung NX200
60
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (206 grams)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
73
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than competition (223 grams)
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Ricoh CX3
Sports photography with Samsung NX200
26
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
55
good MP (20MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Ricoh CX3 Travel photography highlights
Samsung NX200 Travel photography highlights
66
lighter than competition (206g)
built-in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
long reach (300mm)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
68
lighter than competition (223g)
good MP (20 megapixels)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
display is not selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Ricoh CX3
Landscape photography with Samsung NX200
42
you can focus manually
relatively wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual exposure
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
70
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Samsung NX mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
good MP (20MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh CX3 Vlogging factors
Samsung NX200 Vlogging factors
30
relatively wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (206g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external microphone socket
34
comes with face detection focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition (223g)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have external mic socket
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung NX200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX3 and Samsung NX200
 Ricoh CX3Samsung NX200
General Information
Brand Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh CX3 Samsung NX200
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2010-06-16 2012-02-28
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 5472 x 3648
Max native ISO 3200 12800
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points - 15
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Samsung NX
Lens zoom range 28-300mm (10.7x) -
Maximum aperture f/3.5-5.6 -
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Number of lenses - 32
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 920k dots 614k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display technology - Active Matrix OLED screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter rate - 7.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 4.00 m no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize - 1/180s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Optional
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 206 grams (0.45 lbs) 223 grams (0.49 lbs)
Physical dimensions 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 117 x 63 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 69
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.6
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.6
DXO Low light rating not tested 618
Other
Battery life - 330 pictures
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID DB-100 BC1030
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) Yes (2 sec to 30 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Cost at release $329 $818