Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung ST65
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched June 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Announced January 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung ST65 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Ricoh CX3 and Samsung ST65, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the CX3 (10MP) and ST65 (14MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe CX3 was announced 7 months earlier than the ST65 and they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the CX3 scores versus the ST65 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung ST65 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh CX3 & Samsung ST65. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh CX3 Gallery & Samsung ST65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Samsung ST65
| CX3 | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Ricoh CX3
| ST65 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2011 |  | June 2010 | Newer by 7 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX3 and Samsung ST65
| CX3 | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh CX3 offers outer measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung ST65 has measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh CX3 and Samsung ST65 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the CX3 against the ST65.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the CX3 and ST65 is 92 and 99 respectively.
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to see the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by checking out specs. The picture here may offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the CX3 and ST65.
All in all, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Samsung ST65 to provide extra detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged CX3 will be behind in sensor technology.
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung ST65 Specifications
| Ricoh CX3 | Samsung ST65 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh CX3 | Samsung ST65 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2011-01-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | - |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | () |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 920k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206 grams (0.45 lb) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | DB-100 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $329 | $130 |
