Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung TL320
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
98 Imaging
34 Features
36 Overall
34
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched June 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Launched February 2009
- Other Name is WB1000
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung TL320 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Ricoh CX3 versus Samsung TL320, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the CX3 (10MP) and the TL320 (12MP) is pretty similar and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe CX3 was revealed 16 months after the TL320 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the CX3 grades vs the TL320 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh CX3 and Samsung TL320. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX3 Gallery and Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Samsung TL320
CX3 | TL320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2010 | February 2009 | Newer by 16 months | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Ricoh CX3
TL320 | CX3 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh CX3 and Samsung TL320
CX3 | TL320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither features Touch screen |
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Ricoh CX3 enjoys physical measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL320 has measurements of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check the Ricoh CX3 versus Samsung TL320 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the CX3 and the TL320.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the CX3 and TL320 is 92 and 98 respectively.
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions only by going over technical specs. The image below may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the CX3 and TL320.
As you can tell, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Samsung TL320 to offer you extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The fresher CX3 should have an edge in sensor innovation.
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
Ricoh CX3 | Samsung TL320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh CX3 | Samsung TL320 |
Also called as | - | WB1000 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2009-02-23 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/2.8-5.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 16 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 206g (0.45 pounds) | - |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | DB-100 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $329 | $380 |