Clicky

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung TL320

Portability
92
Imaging
33
Features
35
Overall
33
Ricoh CX3 front
 
Samsung TL320 front
Portability
98
Imaging
34
Features
36
Overall
34

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs

Ricoh CX3
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
  • Launched June 2010
Samsung TL320
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
  • n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
  • Launched February 2009
  • Other Name is WB1000
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung TL320 Overview

Here, we will be contrasting the Ricoh CX3 versus Samsung TL320, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the CX3 (10MP) and the TL320 (12MP) is pretty similar and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The CX3 was revealed 16 months after the TL320 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the CX3 grades vs the TL320 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Samsung TL320

 CX3 TL320 
LaunchedJune 2010February 2009Newer by 16 months
Screen resolution920k460kSharper screen (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Ricoh CX3

 TL320 CX3 

Common features in the Ricoh CX3 and Samsung TL320

 CX3 TL320 
Manual focus Very precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen dimensions
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch screen Neither features Touch screen

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Ricoh CX3 enjoys physical measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL320 has measurements of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Check the Ricoh CX3 versus Samsung TL320 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the CX3 and the TL320.

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung TL320 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the CX3 and TL320 is 92 and 98 respectively.

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung TL320 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be hard to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions only by going over technical specs. The image below may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the CX3 and TL320.

As you can tell, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Samsung TL320 to offer you extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The fresher CX3 should have an edge in sensor innovation.

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung TL320 sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh CX3 Portrait photography info
Samsung TL320 Portrait photography info
26
you can focus manually
no manual control
can't use external flash
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
33
manual focus
includes face detection autofocus
external flash not possible
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Ricoh CX3 Street photography highlights
Samsung TL320 Street photography highlights
60
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (206g)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
58
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Ricoh CX3 Sports photography advice
Samsung TL320 Sports photography advice
26
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
low MP (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
29
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
low MP (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Ricoh CX3 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung TL320 as a Travel photography camera
66
lighter than competitors (206 grams)
has built in flash
rather wide (28mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
low MP (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.5)
59
built-in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
low MP (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh CX3 Landscape photography factors
Samsung TL320 Landscape photography factors
42
you can focus manually
rather wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
no manual control
low MP (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
43
manual focus
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
low MP (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh CX3 Vlogging factors
Samsung TL320 Vlogging factors
30
rather wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (206g)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have microphone port
31
reasonably wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection autofocus
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external microphone jack
Photography Glossary

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung TL320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX3 and Samsung TL320
 Ricoh CX3Samsung TL320
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh CX3 Samsung TL320
Also called as - WB1000
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Ultracompact
Launched 2010-06-16 2009-02-23
Body design Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 80 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-300mm (10.7x) 24-120mm (5.0x)
Max aperture f/3.5-5.6 f/2.8-5.8
Macro focusing distance 1cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 920k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 seconds 16 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.00 m 5.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 206g (0.45 pounds) -
Physical dimensions 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID DB-100 -
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $329 $380