Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB1100F
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
67 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB1100F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched June 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-875mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 512g - 125 x 87 x 96mm
- Revealed January 2014
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB1100F Overview
Here is a detailed assessment of the Ricoh CX3 versus Samsung WB1100F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the CX3 (10MP) and WB1100F (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe CX3 was manufactured 4 years prior to the WB1100F and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB1100F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise view of how the CX3 grades vs the WB1100F for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB1100F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh CX3 and Samsung WB1100F. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh CX3 Gallery and Samsung WB1100F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Samsung WB1100F
CX3 | WB1100F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB1100F over the Ricoh CX3
WB1100F | CX3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2014 | June 2010 | Fresher by 43 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX3 and Samsung WB1100F
CX3 | WB1100F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB1100F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh CX3 provides outer measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB1100F has dimensions of 125mm x 87mm x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") having a weight of 512 grams (1.13 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh CX3 versus Samsung WB1100F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the CX3 compared to the WB1100F.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the CX3 and WB1100F is 92 and 67 respectively.
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB1100F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizing merely by checking a spec sheet. The visual here may give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the CX3 and WB1100F.
As you can see, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Samsung WB1100F to give you more detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a little more aggressively. The older CX3 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB1100F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB1100F Specifications
Ricoh CX3 | Samsung WB1100F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh CX3 | Samsung WB1100F |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 25-875mm (35.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206 gr (0.45 lb) | 512 gr (1.13 lb) |
Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 125 x 87 x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | DB-100 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $329 | $250 |