Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB150F
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
93 Imaging
38 Features
42 Overall
39
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Released June 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB150F Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Ricoh CX3 versus Samsung WB150F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the CX3 (10MP) and WB150F (14MP) but they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe CX3 was unveiled 19 months prior to the WB150F making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short summation of how the CX3 matches up against the WB150F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh CX3 and Samsung WB150F. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX3 Gallery and Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Samsung WB150F
| CX3 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Ricoh CX3
| WB150F | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | June 2010 | Newer by 19 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX3 and Samsung WB150F
| CX3 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh CX3 has outer dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB150F has measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh CX3 versus Samsung WB150F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the CX3 vs the WB150F.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the CX3 and WB150F is 92 and 93 respectively.
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to picture the difference between sensor dimensions just by going over specifications. The picture here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the CX3 and WB150F.
To sum up, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You should expect to see the Samsung WB150F to offer more detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged CX3 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
| Ricoh CX3 | Samsung WB150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh CX3 | Samsung WB150F |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2010-06-16 | 2012-01-09 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 16s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206g (0.45 pounds) | 188g (0.41 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | DB-100 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $329 | $230 |
