Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB2200F
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced June 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Announced January 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Ricoh CX3 versus Samsung WB2200F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the CX3 (10MP) and WB2200F (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe CX3 was unveiled 4 years prior to the WB2200F and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the CX3 matches up against the WB2200F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh CX3 and Samsung WB2200F. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX3 Gallery and Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Samsung WB2200F
| CX3 | WB2200F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Ricoh CX3
| WB2200F | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 |  | June 2010 | Fresher by 43 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX3 and Samsung WB2200F
| CX3 | WB2200F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX3 enjoys exterior measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB2200F has sizing of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") having a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh CX3 versus Samsung WB2200F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select during that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the CX3 and the WB2200F.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the CX3 and WB2200F is 92 and 59 respectively.
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to see the contrast in sensor sizing just by checking out specs. The visual underneath might give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the CX3 and WB2200F.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Samsung WB2200F to provide more detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics more aggressively. The older CX3 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
| Ricoh CX3 | Samsung WB2200F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh CX3 | Samsung WB2200F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-06-16 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 200 thousand dot |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 1/8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206 gr (0.45 lb) | 708 gr (1.56 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | DB-100 | BP-1410 |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $329 | $599 |