Clicky

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB30F

Portability
92
Imaging
33
Features
35
Overall
33
Ricoh CX3 front
 
Samsung WB30F front
Portability
96
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs

Ricoh CX3
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
  • Released June 2010
Samsung WB30F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
  • Revealed January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB30F Overview

Here is a detailed assessment of the Ricoh CX3 and Samsung WB30F, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the CX3 (10MP) and WB30F (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The CX3 was unveiled 3 years earlier than the WB30F and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before diving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the CX3 scores versus the WB30F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Samsung WB30F

 CX3 WB30F 
Focus manually Very exact focus
Screen resolution920k230kCrisper screen (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Ricoh CX3

 WB30F CX3 
RevealedJanuary 2013June 2010Fresher by 31 months

Common features in the Ricoh CX3 and Samsung WB30F

 CX3 WB30F 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen dimensions
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch screen No Touch screen

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison

If you're going to carry your camera, you need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh CX3 comes with outer dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung WB30F has dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).

Check out the Ricoh CX3 and Samsung WB30F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the CX3 vs the WB30F.

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB30F size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the CX3 and WB30F is 92 and 96 respectively.

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB30F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it's hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing just by going over specifications. The visual underneath might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the CX3 and WB30F.

To sum up, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should count on the Samsung WB30F to offer extra detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a little more aggressively. The older CX3 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB30F sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh CX3 Portrait photography highlights
Samsung WB30F Portrait photography highlights
26
you can focus manually
manual exposure not available
no external flash support
low MP (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
35
MP count decent (16MP)
provides face detection autofocus
no manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Ricoh CX3 Street photography highlights
Samsung WB30F Street photography highlights
60
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (206 grams)
fixed screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
64
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (128 grams)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Ricoh CX3
Sports photography with Samsung WB30F
26
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
45
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Ricoh CX3 Travel photography info
Samsung WB30F Travel photography info
66
lighter than competition (206g)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
low MP (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.5)
69
lighter than competitors in class (128 grams)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
lack of Timelapse function
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Ricoh CX3
Landscape photography with Samsung WB30F
42
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (28mm)
screen size is decent (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
manual exposure not available
low MP (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
43
rather wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
no manual control
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
lack of Timelapse function
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh CX3 Vlogging features
Samsung WB30F Vlogging features
30
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (206g)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external microphone support
33
rather wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection autofocus
lighter than competitors in class (128g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external microphone jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB30F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX3 and Samsung WB30F
 Ricoh CX3Samsung WB30F
General Information
Make Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh CX3 Samsung WB30F
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Released 2010-06-16 2013-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 -
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-300mm (10.7x) 24-240mm (10.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.6 f/3.1-6.3
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 920k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech - QVGA TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 seconds 8 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.00 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync -
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 206 grams (0.45 lb) 128 grams (0.28 lb)
Dimensions 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model DB-100 -
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Launch cost $329 $180