Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB35F
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched June 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Ricoh CX3 and Samsung WB35F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the CX3 (10MP) and WB35F (16MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe CX3 was unveiled 4 years prior to the WB35F which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the CX3 matches up versus the WB35F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh CX3 and Samsung WB35F. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX3 Gallery and Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Samsung WB35F
| CX3 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Ricoh CX3
| WB35F | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2014 |  | June 2010 | More modern by 43 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX3 and Samsung WB35F
| CX3 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera, you need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh CX3 features exterior dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has dimensions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Ricoh CX3 and Samsung WB35F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the CX3 versus the WB35F.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the CX3 and WB35F is 92 and 93 respectively.
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to see the gap in sensor sizes simply by going through specs. The picture here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX3 and WB35F.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Samsung WB35F to provide extra detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged CX3 will be behind in sensor tech.
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Ricoh CX3 | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh CX3 | Samsung WB35F |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 920k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) | 194 grams (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | DB-100 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $329 | $130 |