Clicky

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB50F

Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34
Ricoh CX3 front
 
Samsung WB50F front
Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
36
Overall
38

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs

Ricoh CX3
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
  • Released June 2010
Samsung WB50F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
  • Launched January 2014
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB50F Overview

Let's look more in depth at the Ricoh CX3 and Samsung WB50F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the CX3 (10MP) and WB50F (16MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The CX3 was announced 4 years before the WB50F and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the CX3 grades versus the WB50F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Samsung WB50F

 CX3 WB50F 
Screen resolution920k460kCrisper screen (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Ricoh CX3

 WB50F CX3 
LaunchedJanuary 2014June 2010Fresher by 43 months

Common features in the Ricoh CX3 and Samsung WB50F

 CX3 WB50F 
Focus manually More accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen dimensions
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lacking Touch friendly screen

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry your camera often, you should take into account its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX3 has got exterior dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung WB50F has sizing of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") and a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).

Examine the Ricoh CX3 and Samsung WB50F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the CX3 compared to the WB50F.

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB50F size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the CX3 and WB50F is 92 and 92 respectively.

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB50F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizing purely by researching a spec sheet. The visual below may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the CX3 and WB50F.

Clearly, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You should expect the Samsung WB50F to result in extra detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The older CX3 will be behind in sensor technology.

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB50F sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh CX3 Portrait photography factors
Samsung WB50F Portrait photography factors
27
manual focus
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
low MP (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
37
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Ricoh CX3 Street photography features
Samsung WB50F Street photography features
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (206g)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (207 grams)
screen does not articulate
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Ricoh CX3 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung WB50F as a Sports photography camera
27
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
low MP (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
40
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
no shutter priority
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Ricoh CX3 Travel photography advice
Samsung WB50F Travel photography advice
66
lighter than competition (206 grams)
flash built-in
pretty wide (28mm)
very long reach (300mm)
low MP (10 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
69
lighter than others (207g)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
long zoom (288mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh CX3 Landscape photography information
Samsung WB50F Landscape photography information
42
manual focus
pretty wide (28mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual mode
low MP (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
47
manual focus
pretty wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
manual mode not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
lack of Time Lapse function
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh CX3
Vlogging with Samsung WB50F
30
pretty wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (206g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external mic socket
30
pretty wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (207g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of mic port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Ricoh CX3 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX3 and Samsung WB50F
 Ricoh CX3Samsung WB50F
General Information
Brand Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh CX3 Samsung WB50F
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2010-06-16 2014-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 80 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-300mm (10.7x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Max aperture f/3.5-5.6 f/3.1-6.3
Macro focus range 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 920 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 seconds -
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 4.00 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync -
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 206 gr (0.45 pounds) 207 gr (0.46 pounds)
Physical dimensions 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model DB-100 BP70A
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) -
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Launch pricing $329 $180