Ricoh CX3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
70 Imaging
63 Features
38 Overall
53
Ricoh CX3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Released February 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh CX3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Ricoh CX3 and Sigma DP2 Quattro, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Ricoh and Sigma. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the CX3 (10MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the CX3 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) feature totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe CX3 was launched 4 years earlier than the DP2 Quattro and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief overview of how the CX3 matches up vs the DP2 Quattro in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh CX3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh CX3 and Sigma DP2 Quattro. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh CX3 Gallery and Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
| CX3 | DP2 Quattro |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Ricoh CX3
| DP2 Quattro | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 |  | June 2010 | More recent by 44 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX3 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
| CX3 | DP2 Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 920k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither comes with Touch display |
Ricoh CX3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh CX3 comes with physical dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP2 Quattro has measurements of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") along with a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh CX3 and Sigma DP2 Quattro in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the CX3 and the DP2 Quattro.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the CX3 and DP2 Quattro is 92 and 70 respectively.
Ricoh CX3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to see the contrast between sensor measurements merely by reviewing specifications. The visual here will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the CX3 and DP2 Quattro.
To sum up, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The CX3 because of its tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will offer you greater detail utilizing its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The older CX3 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh CX3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Ricoh CX3 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
| Ricoh CX3 | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Sigma |
| Model type | Ricoh CX3 | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2010-06-16 | 2014-02-13 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | TRUE III engine |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5424 x 3616 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 45mm (1x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 920k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206 gr (0.45 lbs) | 395 gr (0.87 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | DB-100 | BP-51 |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $329 | $931 |