Clicky

Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A350

Portability
92
Imaging
33
Features
35
Overall
33
Ricoh CX3 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 front
Portability
62
Imaging
53
Features
47
Overall
50

Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A350 Key Specs

Ricoh CX3
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
  • Introduced June 2010
Sony A350
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 674g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
  • Launched June 2008
  • Updated by Sony A380
Photography Glossary

Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A350 Overview

On this page, we will be matching up the Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A350, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the CX3 (10MP) and A350 (14MP) and the CX3 (1/2.3") and A350 (APS-C) have different sensor dimensions.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The CX3 was launched 2 years later than the A350 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera and the Sony A350 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief view of how the CX3 grades vs the A350 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Sony A350

 CX3 A350 
LaunchedJune 2010June 2008Fresher by 25 months
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kCrisper screen (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony A350 over the Ricoh CX3

 A350 CX3 
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Common features in the Ricoh CX3 and Sony A350

 CX3 A350 
Focus manually More exact focusing
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly screen No Touch friendly screen

Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A350 Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to carry your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh CX3 has got external dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Sony A350 has proportions of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") along with a weight of 674 grams (1.49 lbs).

See the Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A350 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at the time. Following is a front view size comparison of the CX3 and the A350.

Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A350 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the CX3 and A350 is 92 and 62 respectively.

Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A350 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A350 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very tough to visualize the difference in sensor sizing simply by viewing specs. The visual below will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the CX3 and A350.

As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The CX3 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving bokeh trickier and the Sony A350 will result in greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The younger CX3 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A350 sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A350 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh CX3 Portrait photography features
Sony A350 Portrait photography features
26
you can focus manually
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
71
focusing manually
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Ricoh CX3 Street photography highlights
Sony A350 Street photography highlights
60
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (206g)
fixed screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
66
tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
more heavy than competition (674g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Ricoh CX3 as a Sports photography camera
Sony A350 as a Sports photography camera
26
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports phase detect autofocus
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Ricoh CX3 Travel photography advice
Sony A350 Travel photography advice
66
lighter than average (206 grams)
flash built-in
quite wide (28mm)
long zoom (300mm)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
51
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
missing Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition (674g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh CX3 Landscape photography highlights
Sony A350 Landscape photography highlights
42
you can focus manually
quite wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
no manual control
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
64
focusing manually
change lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
small screen (2.7 inch)
missing Timelapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh CX3 Vlogging details
Sony A350 Vlogging details
30
quite wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (206 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external microphone support
9
lack of video recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A350 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX3 and Sony A350
 Ricoh CX3Sony Alpha DSLR-A350
General Information
Make Ricoh Sony
Model Ricoh CX3 Sony Alpha DSLR-A350
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Entry-Level DSLR
Introduced 2010-06-16 2008-06-06
Physical type Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Powered by Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4592 x 3056
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens focal range 28-300mm (10.7x) -
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.6 -
Macro focus range 1cm -
Number of lenses - 143
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen size 3 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of screen 920 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting rate - 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.00 m 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Highest video resolution 1280x720 None
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 206 grams (0.45 lbs) 674 grams (1.49 lbs)
Physical dimensions 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 65
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.6
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.5
DXO Low light score not tested 595
Other
Battery model DB-100 -
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $329 $600