Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-5N
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33


89 Imaging
56 Features
69 Overall
61
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-5N Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced June 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 111 x 59 x 38mm
- Released October 2011
- Previous Model is Sony NEX-5
- Replacement is Sony NEX-5R

Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-5N Overview
The following is a in-depth review of the Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-5N, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Ricoh and Sony. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the CX3 (10MP) and NEX-5N (16MP) and the CX3 (1/2.3") and NEX-5N (APS-C) posses totally different sensor dimensions.

The CX3 was released 15 months before the NEX-5N making them a generation away from one another. Both the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-5N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short summation of how the CX3 grades vs the NEX-5N with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-5N Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh CX3 & Sony Alpha NEX-5N. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX3 Gallery & Sony NEX-5N Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Sony NEX-5N
CX3 | NEX-5N |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-5N over the Ricoh CX3
NEX-5N | CX3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2011 | ![]() | June 2010 | Newer by 15 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh CX3 and Sony NEX-5N
CX3 | NEX-5N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 920k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-5N Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh CX3 comes with physical measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-5N has measurements of 111mm x 59mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-5N in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the CX3 versus the NEX-5N.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the CX3 and NEX-5N is 92 and 89 respectively.

Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-5N Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by checking out technical specs. The pic here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the CX3 and NEX-5N.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The CX3 due to its smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Sony NEX-5N will produce greater detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged CX3 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-5N Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-5N Specifications
Ricoh CX3 | Sony Alpha NEX-5N | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh CX3 | Sony Alpha NEX-5N |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2010-06-16 | 2011-10-03 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4912 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | Tilt Up 80°, Down 45° TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 12.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) | 269 grams (0.59 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 111 x 59 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 77 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1079 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 460 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB-100 | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $329 | $550 |