Clicky

Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-5N

Portability
92
Imaging
33
Features
35
Overall
33
Ricoh CX3 front
 
Sony Alpha NEX-5N front
Portability
89
Imaging
56
Features
69
Overall
61

Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-5N Key Specs

Ricoh CX3
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
  • Announced June 2010
Sony NEX-5N
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 269g - 111 x 59 x 38mm
  • Released October 2011
  • Previous Model is Sony NEX-5
  • Replacement is Sony NEX-5R
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-5N Overview

The following is a in-depth review of the Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-5N, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Ricoh and Sony. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the CX3 (10MP) and NEX-5N (16MP) and the CX3 (1/2.3") and NEX-5N (APS-C) posses totally different sensor dimensions.

Photography Glossary

The CX3 was released 15 months before the NEX-5N making them a generation away from one another. Both the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-5N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short summation of how the CX3 grades vs the NEX-5N with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

        

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Sony NEX-5N

 CX3 NEX-5N 

Reasons to pick Sony NEX-5N over the Ricoh CX3

 NEX-5N CX3 
ReleasedOctober 2011June 2010Newer by 15 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Ricoh CX3 and Sony NEX-5N

 CX3 NEX-5N 
Manual focus Dial exact focusing
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display sizing
Display resolution920k920kSame display resolution
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen

Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-5N Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh CX3 comes with physical measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-5N has measurements of 111mm x 59mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).

Take a look at the Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-5N in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the CX3 versus the NEX-5N.

Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-5N size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the CX3 and NEX-5N is 92 and 89 respectively.

Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-5N top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-5N Sensor Comparison

Typically, its difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by checking out technical specs. The pic here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the CX3 and NEX-5N.

As you have seen, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The CX3 due to its smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Sony NEX-5N will produce greater detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged CX3 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-5N sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-5N Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-5N Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh CX3
Portrait photography with Sony NEX-5N
26
manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
low MP (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
73
manual focus
megapixel count decent (16MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
includes face detect autofocus
delivers RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh CX3
Street photography with Sony NEX-5N
60
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (206g)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
80
screen tilts
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
comes with focus via touch
above average high ISO (25,600)
does not have image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Ricoh CX3 Sports photography features
Sony NEX-5N Sports photography features
26
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
low MP (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
58
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
good battery life (460 shots)
does not have image stabilization
has no phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Ricoh CX3 Travel photography advice
Sony NEX-5N Travel photography advice
66
lighter than others (206g)
built-in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
very long reach (300mm)
low MP (10 megapixels)
does not posses selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
70
good battery life (460 CIPA)
comes with focus via touch
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
lack of Timelapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh CX3 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony NEX-5N as a Landscape photography camera
42
manual focus
relatively wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
no manual control
low MP (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
71
manual focus
swap lenses (Sony E mount)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
above average high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW files
good battery life (460 CIPA)
does not have image stabilization
lack of Timelapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh CX3 Vlogging info
Sony NEX-5N Vlogging info
30
relatively wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (206 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
does not posses selfie friendly display
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external mic socket
33
built-in touchscreen
includes face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
lack of microphone socket
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-5N Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX3 and Sony NEX-5N
 Ricoh CX3Sony Alpha NEX-5N
General Information
Make Ricoh Sony
Model Ricoh CX3 Sony Alpha NEX-5N
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Entry-Level Mirrorless
Announced 2010-06-16 2011-10-03
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Smooth Imaging Engine IV Bionz
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.4 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 365.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 4912 x 3264
Max native ISO 3200 25600
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points - 25
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sony E
Lens focal range 28-300mm (10.7x) -
Highest aperture f/3.5-5.6 -
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Available lenses - 121
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 920 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech - Tilt Up 80°, Down 45° TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter rate - 10.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 4.00 m 12.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize - 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG AVCHD
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 206 grams (0.45 lbs) 269 grams (0.59 lbs)
Physical dimensions 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 111 x 59 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 77
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.6
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.7
DXO Low light score not tested 1079
Other
Battery life - 460 photographs
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model DB-100 NPFW50
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images))
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $329 $550