Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-C3
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
91 Imaging
56 Features
57 Overall
56
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-C3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
- Introduced August 2011
- Succeeded the Sony NEX-3
- New Model is Sony NEX-F3
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-C3 Overview
Below is a thorough comparison of the Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-C3, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Ricoh and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the CX3 (10MP) and NEX-C3 (16MP) and the CX3 (1/2.3") and NEX-C3 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe CX3 was brought out 14 months earlier than the NEX-C3 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-C3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a short summation of how the CX3 grades against the NEX-C3 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-C3 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh CX3 & Sony Alpha NEX-C3. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh CX3 Gallery & Sony NEX-C3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Sony NEX-C3
CX3 | NEX-C3 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-C3 over the Ricoh CX3
NEX-C3 | CX3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2011 | June 2010 | More recent by 14 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Ricoh CX3 and Sony NEX-C3
CX3 | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 920k | Equal screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-C3 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Ricoh CX3 features external measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Sony NEX-C3 has measurements of 110mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-C3 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using during that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the CX3 against the NEX-C3.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the CX3 and NEX-C3 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-C3 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to see the contrast between sensor measurements just by reading through specs. The graphic here might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the CX3 and NEX-C3.
All in all, both of those cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The CX3 due to its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF tougher and the Sony NEX-C3 will give you greater detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older CX3 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony NEX-C3 Specifications
Ricoh CX3 | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh CX3 | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2010-06-16 | 2011-08-22 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 6.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 206g (0.45 lb) | 225g (0.50 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.2 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1083 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 pictures |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB-100 | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $329 | $343 |