Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A6300
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b47f9/b47f930de28b117873fba531eee680f0fd88065c" alt="Ricoh CX3 front Ricoh CX3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc101/dc10188719485a09ad742701947499d616aae498" alt="Sony Alpha a6300 front Sony Alpha a6300 front"
83 Imaging
66 Features
82 Overall
72
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A6300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed June 2010
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Increase to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 404g - 120 x 67 x 49mm
- Launched February 2016
- Succeeded the Sony A6000
- Successor is Sony A6500
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A6300 Overview
Here is a detailed review of the Ricoh CX3 versus Sony A6300, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Ricoh and Sony. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the CX3 (10MP) and A6300 (24MP) and the CX3 (1/2.3") and A6300 (APS-C) have different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The CX3 was manufactured 6 years earlier than the A6300 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera and the Sony A6300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short overview of how the CX3 matches up vs the A6300 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A6300 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh CX3 and Sony Alpha a6300. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh CX3 Gallery and Sony A6300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Sony A6300
CX3 | A6300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A6300 over the Ricoh CX3
A6300 | CX3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2016 | ![]() | June 2010 | Fresher by 68 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 920k | Crisper display (+2k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh CX3 and Sony A6300
CX3 | A6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch display |
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A6300 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Ricoh CX3 offers physical measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Sony A6300 has proportions of 120mm x 67mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 404 grams (0.89 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh CX3 versus Sony A6300 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select during that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the CX3 and the A6300.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f271e/f271ead4079d75227c03d0c4092e2919befdac62" alt="Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A6300 size comparison Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A6300 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the CX3 and A6300 is 92 and 83 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b432/9b432867b5c4d3f9c761e9a6d0c8daa6d0e5a6da" alt="Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A6300 top view buttons comparison Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A6300 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A6300 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to picture the difference between sensor sizing simply by looking at specifications. The photograph below might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the CX3 and A6300.
To sum up, both of those cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The CX3 because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sony A6300 will resolve more detail due to its extra 14MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older CX3 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0649/a0649dee4eb4234eb6247421ec4bf828e241aad3" alt="Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A6300 sensor size comparison Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A6300 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A6300 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39973/3997315bd6840951af5a619b0e4eda2cfca101fd" alt="Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A6300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A6300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony A6300 Specifications
Ricoh CX3 | Sony Alpha a6300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh CX3 | Sony Alpha a6300 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2010-06-16 | 2016-02-03 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 24MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 11.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction, Hi-speed sync, Wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (24p) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206 grams (0.45 pounds) | 404 grams (0.89 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 120 x 67 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 85 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1437 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 shots |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB-100 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | With downloadable app | |
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $329 | $889 |