Ricoh CX3 vs Sony HX400V
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
62 Imaging
45 Features
60 Overall
51
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony HX400V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed June 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 660g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Earlier Model is Sony HX300
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony HX400V Overview
Below is a extensive assessment of the Ricoh CX3 vs Sony HX400V, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Ricoh and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the CX3 (10MP) and HX400V (20MP) but they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe CX3 was released 4 years before the HX400V and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX400V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the CX3 matches up against the HX400V for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony HX400V Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh CX3 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh CX3 Gallery & Sony HX400V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Sony HX400V
CX3 | HX400V |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX400V over the Ricoh CX3
HX400V | CX3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2014 | June 2010 | More recent by 44 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 921k | 920k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh CX3 and Sony HX400V
CX3 | HX400V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither offers Touch display |
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony HX400V Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Ricoh CX3 offers physical measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Sony HX400V has proportions of 130mm x 93mm x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") along with a weight of 660 grams (1.46 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh CX3 vs Sony HX400V in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at the time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the CX3 vs the HX400V.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the CX3 and HX400V is 92 and 62 respectively.
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony HX400V Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to imagine the gap in sensor measurements merely by checking out specifications. The photograph below will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the CX3 and HX400V.
Plainly, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can anticipate the Sony HX400V to show extra detail as a result of its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older CX3 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony HX400V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony HX400V Specifications
Ricoh CX3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh CX3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2010-06-16 | 2014-02-12 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | Bionz X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/2.8-6.3 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 8.50 m (ISO Auto) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Flash Off / Autoflash / Fill-flash / Slow Sync. / Advanced Flash / Rear Sync. / Wireless (with optional compliant flash) |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) | 660 grams (1.46 lbs) |
Dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 images |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB-100 | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $329 | $448 |