Ricoh CX3 vs Sony HX5
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b47f9/b47f930de28b117873fba531eee680f0fd88065c" alt="Ricoh CX3 front Ricoh CX3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ca95/0ca95c8e14e84383d15e4103dce8f71a2d2af124" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5 front"
92 Imaging
33 Features
30 Overall
31
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony HX5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 200g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched June 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony HX5 Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Ricoh CX3 versus Sony HX5, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the CX3 (10MP) and the HX5 (10MP) is relatively close but the CX3 (1/2.3") and HX5 (1/2.4") offer different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The CX3 was unveiled at a similar time to the HX5 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a short highlight of how the CX3 matches up vs the HX5 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony HX5 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh CX3 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX3 Gallery and Sony HX5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Sony HX5
CX3 | HX5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony HX5 over the Ricoh CX3
HX5 | CX3 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh CX3 and Sony HX5
CX3 | HX5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2010 | ![]() | June 2010 | Same generation |
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Missing Touch screen |
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony HX5 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera, you will want to factor its weight and proportions. The Ricoh CX3 has got outer measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Sony HX5 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh CX3 versus Sony HX5 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the CX3 versus the HX5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f678a/f678a2cd5df398a4f1bbf87176320d2939b33666" alt="Ricoh CX3 vs Sony HX5 size comparison Ricoh CX3 vs Sony HX5 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the CX3 and HX5 is 92 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60f5b/60f5b3cf13584b415953ded9502781697f82228a" alt="Ricoh CX3 vs Sony HX5 top view buttons comparison Ricoh CX3 vs Sony HX5 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony HX5 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizes simply by researching specifications. The picture underneath will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the CX3 and HX5.
To sum up, both the cameras come with the identical resolution albeit different sensor sizes. The CX3 includes the bigger sensor which will make obtaining shallow DOF easier.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa169/aa169f0c896e5861d23a70018e9f004fa0795039" alt="Ricoh CX3 vs Sony HX5 sensor size comparison Ricoh CX3 vs Sony HX5 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony HX5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db6a5/db6a57e71be0e917d1ed5657f0f3a78e56179ee2" alt="Ricoh CX3 vs Sony HX5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh CX3 vs Sony HX5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh CX3 vs Sony HX5 Specifications
Ricoh CX3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh CX3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2010-06-16 | 2010-06-16 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3456 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 3.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206g (0.45 lbs) | 200g (0.44 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | DB-100 | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1/portrait2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo/ PRO HG-Duo, optional SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $329 | $275 |