Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-30
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed October 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Ricoh CX4 versus Ricoh WG-30, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both built by Ricoh. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the CX4 (10MP) and WG-30 (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe CX4 was released 5 years prior to the WG-30 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a full comparison, below is a quick view of how the CX4 scores versus the WG-30 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-30 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh CX4 & Ricoh WG-30. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh CX4 Gallery & Ricoh WG-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Ricoh WG-30
| CX4 | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Ricoh CX4
| WG-30 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | October 2014 |  | August 2010 | More modern by 50 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX4 and Ricoh WG-30
| CX4 | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh CX4 has got exterior measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-30 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh CX4 versus Ricoh WG-30 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the CX4 and the WG-30.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the CX4 and WG-30 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizes purely by reading technical specs. The pic below may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the CX4 and WG-30.
As you have seen, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Ricoh WG-30 to offer extra detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged CX4 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications
| Ricoh CX4 | Ricoh WG-30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Ricoh |
| Model | Ricoh CX4 | Ricoh WG-30 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2010-08-19 | 2014-10-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lb) | 192 grams (0.42 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | DB-100 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $211 | $428 |