Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
90 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Announced February 2015
- Earlier Model is Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Successor is Ricoh WG-6
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Ricoh CX4 versus Ricoh WG-5 GPS, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are offered by Ricoh. There is a big difference between the image resolutions of the CX4 (10MP) and WG-5 GPS (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe CX4 was unveiled 5 years prior to the WG-5 GPS and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a quick view of how the CX4 grades against the WG-5 GPS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh CX4 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh CX4 Gallery and Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| CX4 | WG-5 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Ricoh CX4
| WG-5 GPS | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2015 |  | August 2010 | More recent by 54 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX4 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| CX4 | WG-5 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX4 has got external measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has sizing of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh CX4 versus Ricoh WG-5 GPS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the CX4 against the WG-5 GPS.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the CX4 and WG-5 GPS is 92 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to imagine the gap between sensor measurements only by reviewing specifications. The photograph underneath will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the CX4 and WG-5 GPS.
Plainly, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You should count on the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to offer you greater detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older CX4 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
| Ricoh CX4 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Ricoh |
| Model | Ricoh CX4 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-08-19 | 2015-02-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 14.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 lb) | 236g (0.52 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 shots |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | DB-100 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $211 | $500 |