Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-70
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced February 2020
- Successor is Ricoh WG-80
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Ricoh CX4 versus Ricoh WG-70, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof and both are built by Ricoh. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the CX4 (10MP) and WG-70 (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe CX4 was manufactured 10 years before the WG-70 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the CX4 matches up versus the WG-70 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh CX4 and Ricoh WG-70. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh CX4 Gallery and Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Ricoh WG-70
| CX4 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Ricoh CX4
| WG-70 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2020 |  | August 2010 | Fresher by 115 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX4 and Ricoh WG-70
| CX4 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Ricoh CX4 provides outer dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-70 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh CX4 versus Ricoh WG-70 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the CX4 against the WG-70.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the CX4 and WG-70 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing simply by going over specs. The graphic below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX4 and WG-70.
All in all, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You should count on the Ricoh WG-70 to deliver more detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The older CX4 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
| Ricoh CX4 | Ricoh WG-70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Ricoh |
| Model type | Ricoh CX4 | Ricoh WG-70 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2010-08-19 | 2020-02-04 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 pounds) | 193 gr (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 images |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | DB-100 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $211 | $280 |