Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-M1
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-M1, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are manufactured by Ricoh. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the CX4 (10MP) and WG-M1 (14MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe CX4 was revealed 5 years earlier than the WG-M1 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a short view of how the CX4 grades versus the WG-M1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh CX4 & Ricoh WG-M1. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh CX4 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| CX4 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 115k | Sharper screen (+805k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Ricoh CX4
| WG-M1 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2014 |  | August 2010 | More recent by 49 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX4 and Ricoh WG-M1
| CX4 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh CX4 has got outer dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-M1 has specifications of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
See the Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-M1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the CX4 versus the WG-M1.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the CX4 and WG-M1 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to visualize the gap in sensor measurements only by checking out specifications. The visual below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the CX4 and WG-M1.
To sum up, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can expect the Ricoh WG-M1 to show extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The older CX4 will be behind in sensor technology.
Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Ricoh CX4 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Ricoh CX4 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Ricoh |
| Model | Ricoh CX4 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2010-08-19 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | (1×) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 1.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 115 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lb) | 190 grams (0.42 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 images |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | DB-100 | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $211 | $2,000 |