Clicky

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung CL5

Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
34
Overall
34
Ricoh CX4 front
 
Samsung CL5 front
Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
14
Overall
24

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung CL5 Key Specs

Ricoh CX4
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
  • Released August 2010
Samsung CL5
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 38-114mm (F3.5-4.5) lens
  • 141g - 93 x 60 x 19mm
  • Introduced February 2009
  • Alternative Name is PL10
Photography Glossary

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung CL5 Overview

Here, we will be comparing the Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung CL5, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the CX4 (10MP) and the CL5 (9MP) is relatively similar but the CX4 (1/2.3") and CL5 (1/2.5") provide different sensor size.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The CX4 was released 19 months after the CL5 which makes them a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera and the Samsung CL5 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short summary of how the CX4 grades vs the CL5 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Samsung CL5

 CX4 CL5 
IntroducedAugust 2010February 2009More modern by 19 months
Manually focus Dial precise focusing
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kCrisper screen (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung CL5 over the Ricoh CX4

 CL5 CX4 

Common features in the Ricoh CX4 and Samsung CL5

 CX4 CL5 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch screen Neither contains Touch screen

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung CL5 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX4 has got outer measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung CL5 has sizing of 93mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") having a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).

Check the Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung CL5 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the CX4 versus the CL5.

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung CL5 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the CX4 and CL5 is 92 and 95 respectively.

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung CL5 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung CL5 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it's tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizes only by going over technical specs. The image underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the CX4 and CL5.

As you can tell, both of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The CX4 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Ricoh CX4 will deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs way more aggressively. The newer CX4 provides an advantage in sensor technology.

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung CL5 sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung CL5 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung CL5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh CX4 Portrait photography info
Samsung CL5 Portrait photography info
27
manual focus
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
24
supports face detect focus
lack of manual focus
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
low MP (9MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Ricoh CX4 Street photography info
Samsung CL5 Street photography info
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (205g)
no articulating screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
47
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Ricoh CX4 Sports photography features
Samsung CL5 Sports photography features
25
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
16
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low MP (9 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.5")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Ricoh CX4
Travel photography with Samsung CL5
66
lighter than competition (205 grams)
has built in flash
decently wide (28mm)
very long reach (300mm)
MP count low (10MP)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
51
has built in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse function
low MP (9 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (38mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Ricoh CX4
Landscape photography with Samsung CL5
42
manual focus
decently wide (28mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
no manual exposure
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
22
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (38mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7")
manual mode not possible
lack of image stabilization
low MP (9MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh CX4 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung CL5 as a Vlogging camera
30
decently wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (205g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external microphone port
25
supports face detect focus
wide angle not fantastic (38mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have mic support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung CL5 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX4 and Samsung CL5
 Ricoh CX4Samsung CL5
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh CX4 Samsung CL5
Also called - PL10
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Ultracompact
Released 2010-08-19 2009-02-23
Physical type Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.5"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 5.744 x 4.308mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 24.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 9 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 3456 x 2592
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-300mm (10.7x) 38-114mm (3.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.6 f/3.5-4.5
Macro focusing range 1cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 6.3
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 920k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 8s 16s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 5.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 4.00 m 4.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 205 gr (0.45 lb) 141 gr (0.31 lb)
Physical dimensions 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 93 x 60 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID DB-100 -
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Card slots 1 1
Launch pricing $211 $391