Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung MV800
92 Imaging
34 Features
34 Overall
34
97 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung MV800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 56 x 10mm
- Launched September 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung MV800 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Ricoh CX4 and Samsung MV800, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the CX4 (10MP) and MV800 (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe CX4 was released 12 months before the MV800 which means that they are of a similar age. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the CX4 grades versus the MV800 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung MV800 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh CX4 & Samsung MV800. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh CX4 Gallery & Samsung MV800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Samsung MV800
| CX4 | MV800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung MV800 over the Ricoh CX4
| MV800 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2011 |  | August 2010 | More modern by 12 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh CX4 and Samsung MV800
| CX4 | MV800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung MV800 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Ricoh CX4 has outside dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung MV800 has specifications of 92mm x 56mm x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
See the Ricoh CX4 and Samsung MV800 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the CX4 and the MV800.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the CX4 and MV800 is 92 and 97 respectively.
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung MV800 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes just by checking technical specs. The pic below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX4 and MV800.
As you have seen, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size but different resolution. You can expect to see the Samsung MV800 to give extra detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged CX4 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung MV800 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung MV800 Specifications
| Ricoh CX4 | Samsung MV800 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh CX4 | Samsung MV800 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2010-08-19 | 2011-09-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 3.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320 x 240 (30/15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lb) | 121 gr (0.27 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 92 x 56 x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | DB-100 | BP70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | Micro SD |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $211 | $499 |
