Clicky

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung MV800

Portability
92
Imaging
33
Features
34
Overall
33
Ricoh CX4 front
 
Samsung MV800 front
Portability
97
Imaging
39
Features
43
Overall
40

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung MV800 Key Specs

Ricoh CX4
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
  • Introduced August 2010
Samsung MV800
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 121g - 92 x 56 x 10mm
  • Launched September 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung MV800 Overview

Lets take a closer look at the Ricoh CX4 and Samsung MV800, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the CX4 (10MP) and MV800 (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The CX4 was released 12 months before the MV800 which means that they are of a similar age. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the CX4 grades versus the MV800 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Samsung MV800

 CX4 MV800 
Manual focus Dial accurate focusing
Display resolution920k460kCrisper display (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung MV800 over the Ricoh CX4

 MV800 CX4 
LaunchedSeptember 2011August 2010More modern by 12 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Ricoh CX4 and Samsung MV800

 CX4 MV800 
Display size3"3"Same display dimensions
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung MV800 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Ricoh CX4 has outside dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung MV800 has specifications of 92mm x 56mm x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).

See the Ricoh CX4 and Samsung MV800 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the CX4 and the MV800.

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung MV800 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the CX4 and MV800 is 92 and 97 respectively.

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung MV800 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung MV800 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes just by checking technical specs. The pic below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX4 and MV800.

As you have seen, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size but different resolution. You can expect to see the Samsung MV800 to give extra detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged CX4 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung MV800 sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung MV800 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung MV800 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh CX4 Portrait photography factors
Samsung MV800 Portrait photography factors
26
focusing manually
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
34
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
features face detection focusing
manual focus not available
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Ricoh CX4 Street photography advice
Samsung MV800 Street photography advice
60
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (205g)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
74
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Optical)
boasts touch focus
lighter than competition in class (121g)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Ricoh CX4
Sports photography with Samsung MV800
24
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
painfully slow continuous shooting (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
44
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
features tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Ricoh CX4 Travel photography features
Samsung MV800 Travel photography features
66
lighter than average in class (205g)
has built in flash
rather wide (28mm)
long zoom (300mm)
megapixel count low (10MP)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
71
lighter than competition in class (121 grams)
boasts touch focus
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (26mm)
lack of Timelapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh CX4 Landscape photography advice
Samsung MV800 Landscape photography advice
42
focusing manually
rather wide (28mm)
decent sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
manual exposure not possible
megapixel count low (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
43
pretty wide (26mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
manual mode not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
lack of Timelapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh CX4 Vlogging info
Samsung MV800 Vlogging info
30
rather wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (205 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external microphone port
34
pretty wide (26mm)
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection focusing
lighter than competition in class (121g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external microphone port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung MV800 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX4 and Samsung MV800
 Ricoh CX4Samsung MV800
General Information
Brand Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh CX4 Samsung MV800
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2010-08-19 2011-09-01
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-300mm (10.7x) 26-130mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.5-5.6 f/3.3-5.9
Macro focus range 1cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 920k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8s 8s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed 5.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.00 m 3.20 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320 x 240 (30/15 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 205 gr (0.45 lb) 121 gr (0.27 lb)
Physical dimensions 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 92 x 56 x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model DB-100 BP70
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) Yes
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal Micro SD
Storage slots One One
Price at release $211 $499