Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung NX300M
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
86 Imaging
62 Features
73 Overall
66
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung NX300M Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed August 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Introduced January 2013
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung NX300M Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung NX300M, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the CX4 (10MP) and NX300M (20MP) and the CX4 (1/2.3") and NX300M (APS-C) provide different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe CX4 was manufactured 3 years before the NX300M and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX300M being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple summary of how the CX4 matches up vs the NX300M in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung NX300M Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh CX4 & Samsung NX300M. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX4 Gallery & Samsung NX300M Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Samsung NX300M
CX4 | NX300M | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 768k | Clearer screen (+152k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300M over the Ricoh CX4
NX300M | CX4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | August 2010 | More recent by 28 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen size | 3.3" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh CX4 and Samsung NX300M
CX4 | NX300M | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung NX300M Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Ricoh CX4 has got physical dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung NX300M has proportions of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") with a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung NX300M in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the CX4 vs the NX300M.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the CX4 and NX300M is 92 and 86 respectively.
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung NX300M Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to picture the gap in sensor measurements just by researching specs. The visual underneath will help give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX4 and NX300M.
All in all, both of those cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The CX4 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Samsung NX300M will provide you with greater detail due to its extra 10MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots way more aggressively. The older CX4 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung NX300M Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung NX300M Specifications
Ricoh CX4 | Samsung NX300M | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh CX4 | Samsung NX300M |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2010-08-19 | 2013-01-03 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 247 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3.3 inch |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 768 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lb) | 331 gr (0.73 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 photographs |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB-100 | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $211 | $699 |