Clicky

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung SL30

Portability
92
Imaging
33
Features
34
Overall
33
Ricoh CX4 front
 
Samsung SL30 front
Portability
95
Imaging
33
Features
14
Overall
25

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung SL30 Key Specs

Ricoh CX4
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
  • Launched August 2010
Samsung SL30
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 38-114mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 140g - 94 x 61 x 23mm
  • Released February 2009
  • Alternative Name is ES15
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung SL30 Overview

Lets look more in depth at the Ricoh CX4 versus Samsung SL30, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the CX4 (10MP) and the SL30 (10MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The CX4 was introduced 19 months later than the SL30 making them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the CX4 scores vs the SL30 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Samsung SL30

 CX4 SL30 
ReleasedAugust 2010February 2009More recent by 19 months
Manually focus Very exact focus
Display size3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution920k230kCrisper display (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung SL30 over the Ricoh CX4

 SL30 CX4 

Common features in the Ricoh CX4 and Samsung SL30

 CX4 SL30 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly display No Touch friendly display

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung SL30 Physical Comparison

If you're looking to lug around your camera, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Ricoh CX4 provides outer dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung SL30 has proportions of 94mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).

Check the Ricoh CX4 versus Samsung SL30 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is a front view size comparison of the CX4 against the SL30.

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung SL30 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the CX4 and SL30 is 92 and 95 respectively.

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung SL30 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung SL30 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements merely by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the CX4 and SL30.

Clearly, both cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same resolution so you should expect comparable quality of images but you should always consider the release date of the cameras into account. The newer CX4 provides a benefit in sensor innovation.

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung SL30 sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung SL30 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung SL30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh CX4 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung SL30 as a Portrait photography camera
26
manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
25
comes with face detect focus
no manual focus
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Ricoh CX4 Street photography highlights
Samsung SL30 Street photography highlights
60
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (205 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
47
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Ricoh CX4 Sports photography info
Samsung SL30 Sports photography info
24
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
continuous shooting slow (5.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
16
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Ricoh CX4 Travel photography features
Samsung SL30 Travel photography features
66
lighter than competitors (205 grams)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
great zoom (300mm)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
51
flash built-in
does not have Time Lapse function
sensor resolution low (10MP)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
wide angle not fantastic (38mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh CX4 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung SL30 as a Landscape photography camera
42
manual focus
reasonably wide (28mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
no manual control
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
22
no manual focus
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (38mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.5")
lack of manual mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
does not have Time Lapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh CX4
Vlogging with Samsung SL30
30
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (205g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have microphone socket
25
comes with face detect focus
wide angle not fantastic (38mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have mic support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung SL30 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX4 and Samsung SL30
 Ricoh CX4Samsung SL30
General Information
Make Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh CX4 Samsung SL30
Also called as - ES15
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2010-08-19 2009-02-17
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 -
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 3200 1600
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-300mm (10.7x) 38-114mm (3.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.6 f/2.8-5.7
Macro focusing range 1cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 2.5 inch
Resolution of screen 920 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 seconds 8 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1500 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 5.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 4.00 m 4.60 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 205 gr (0.45 lbs) 140 gr (0.31 lbs)
Physical dimensions 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 94 x 61 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID DB-100 -
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) Yes
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $211 $93