Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung ST95
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
99 Imaging
38 Features
19 Overall
30
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Announced January 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung ST95 Overview
Below is a thorough assessment of the Ricoh CX4 versus Samsung ST95, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the CX4 (10MP) and ST95 (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe CX4 was released 5 months earlier than the ST95 so they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight into a in depth comparison, below is a short view of how the CX4 grades vs the ST95 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung ST95 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh CX4 & Samsung ST95. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh CX4 Gallery & Samsung ST95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Samsung ST95
| CX4 | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Ricoh CX4
| ST95 | CX4 |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh CX4 and Samsung ST95
| CX4 | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2010 |  | January 2011 | Similar age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX4 provides outside dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung ST95 has sizing of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh CX4 versus Samsung ST95 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the CX4 versus the ST95.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the CX4 and ST95 is 92 and 99 respectively.
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to visualise the gap between sensor measurements purely by reading through specs. The visual here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the CX4 and ST95.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Samsung ST95 to resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively.
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung ST95 Specifications
| Ricoh CX4 | Samsung ST95 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh CX4 | Samsung ST95 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2010-08-19 | 2011-01-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | - |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | () |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lb) | - |
| Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | DB-100 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | - |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $211 | $145 |