Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL210
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
94 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed August 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-135mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Additionally referred to as PL150
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL210 Overview
In this article, we are reviewing the Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL210, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the CX4 (10MP) and the TL210 (12MP) is fairly close and they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe CX4 was revealed 8 months after the TL210 so they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL210 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick summary of how the CX4 grades against the TL210 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL210 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh CX4 and Samsung TL210. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh CX4 Gallery and Samsung TL210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Samsung TL210
| CX4 | TL210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2010 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 8 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL210 over the Ricoh CX4
| TL210 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Common features in the Ricoh CX4 and Samsung TL210
| CX4 | TL210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL210 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh CX4 provides outside dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung TL210 has dimensions of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).
Check the Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL210 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the CX4 compared to the TL210.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the CX4 and TL210 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL210 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizes purely by researching technical specs. The pic below may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the CX4 and TL210.
As you have seen, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You should anticipate the Samsung TL210 to result in greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The newer CX4 should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL210 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL210 Specifications
| Ricoh CX4 | Samsung TL210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh CX4 | Samsung TL210 |
| Also called as | - | PL150 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2010-08-19 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 27-135mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 pounds) | 177 gr (0.39 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | DB-100 | SLB-07B |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $211 | $230 |