Clicky

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL240

Portability
92
Imaging
33
Features
34
Overall
33
Ricoh CX4 front
 
Samsung TL240 front
Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
32
Overall
34

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs

Ricoh CX4
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
  • Revealed August 2010
Samsung TL240
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 4800 (Expand to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
  • 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
  • Introduced January 2010
  • Also Known as ST5000
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL240 Overview

Here, we are matching up the Ricoh CX4 versus Samsung TL240, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the CX4 (10MP) and TL240 (14MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The CX4 was revealed 8 months later than the TL240 so they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the CX4 grades vs the TL240 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Samsung TL240

 CX4 TL240 
IntroducedAugust 2010January 2010Fresher by 8 months
Focus manually Dial accurate focus
Display resolution920k230kSharper display (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Ricoh CX4

 TL240 CX4 
Display size3.5"3"Larger display (+0.5")
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Ricoh CX4 and Samsung TL240

 CX4 TL240 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison

If you are going to carry your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX4 has outer dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung TL240 has sizing of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).

See the Ricoh CX4 versus Samsung TL240 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the CX4 and the TL240.

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL240 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the CX4 and TL240 is 92 and 95 respectively.

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL240 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizing merely by checking a spec sheet. The graphic here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX4 and TL240.

Clearly, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Samsung TL240 to give extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images way more aggressively. The younger CX4 is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL240 sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh CX4 Portrait photography highlights
Samsung TL240 Portrait photography highlights
26
manual focus
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
28
decent MP (14MP)
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Ricoh CX4 Street photography features
Samsung TL240 Street photography features
60
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (205g)
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
60
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports touch to focus
no articulating screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
more heavy than competition (160 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Ricoh CX4 Sports photography features
Samsung TL240 Sports photography features
24
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
low fps (5.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
43
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (14MP)
supports tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Ricoh CX4 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung TL240 as a Travel photography camera
66
lighter than average in class (205 grams)
flash built-in
relatively wide (28mm)
great zoom (300mm)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
60
supports touch to focus
decent MP (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
no Timelapse function
more heavy than competition (160 grams)
does not have selfie friendly screen
wide angle not fantastic (31mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh CX4 Landscape photography info
Samsung TL240 Landscape photography info
42
manual focus
relatively wide (28mm)
screen is a good size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not possible
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
37
lovely big screen (3.5")
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (31mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
lack of manual exposure
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
no Timelapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh CX4 Vlogging factors
Samsung TL240 Vlogging factors
30
relatively wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (205g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not have a selfie friendly display
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have microphone socket
27
screen is touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not fantastic (31mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
does not have selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
no microphone port
more heavy than competition (160 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL240 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX4 and Samsung TL240
 Ricoh CX4Samsung TL240
General Information
Company Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh CX4 Samsung TL240
Also called as - ST5000
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Ultracompact
Revealed 2010-08-19 2010-01-06
Body design Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 4334 x 3256
Highest native ISO 3200 4800
Highest enhanced ISO - 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-300mm (10.7x) 31-217mm (7.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.6 f/3.3-5.5
Macro focusing distance 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3.5 inches
Screen resolution 920 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 8s 8s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1500s
Continuous shutter speed 5.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.00 m 5.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 205 grams (0.45 pounds) 160 grams (0.35 pounds)
Physical dimensions 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID DB-100 SLB-11A
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $211 $171