Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL240
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed August 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Also Known as ST5000
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL240 Overview
Here, we are matching up the Ricoh CX4 versus Samsung TL240, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the CX4 (10MP) and TL240 (14MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe CX4 was revealed 8 months later than the TL240 so they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the CX4 grades vs the TL240 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh CX4 and Samsung TL240. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX4 Gallery and Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Samsung TL240
CX4 | TL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2010 | January 2010 | Fresher by 8 months | |
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Ricoh CX4
TL240 | CX4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh CX4 and Samsung TL240
CX4 | TL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX4 has outer dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung TL240 has sizing of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Ricoh CX4 versus Samsung TL240 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the CX4 and the TL240.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the CX4 and TL240 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizing merely by checking a spec sheet. The graphic here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX4 and TL240.
Clearly, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Samsung TL240 to give extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images way more aggressively. The younger CX4 is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
Ricoh CX4 | Samsung TL240 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh CX4 | Samsung TL240 |
Also called as | - | ST5000 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2010-08-19 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4334 x 3256 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 4800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.3-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 5.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205 grams (0.45 pounds) | 160 grams (0.35 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | DB-100 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $211 | $171 |