Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL320
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
98 Imaging
34 Features
36 Overall
34
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Released February 2009
- Also referred to as WB1000
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL320 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Ricoh CX4 and Samsung TL320, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the CX4 (10MP) and the TL320 (12MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe CX4 was unveiled 19 months after the TL320 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a short summation of how the CX4 grades against the TL320 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh CX4 and Samsung TL320. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX4 Gallery and Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Samsung TL320
| CX4 | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2010 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 19 months |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Ricoh CX4
| TL320 | CX4 |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh CX4 and Samsung TL320
| CX4 | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX4 has got physical measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung TL320 has sizing of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh CX4 and Samsung TL320 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the CX4 and the TL320.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the CX4 and TL320 is 92 and 98 respectively.
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to see the contrast between sensor sizes simply by checking specifications. The image below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the CX4 and TL320.
To sum up, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Samsung TL320 to resolve extra detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures more aggressively. The fresher CX4 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
| Ricoh CX4 | Samsung TL320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh CX4 | Samsung TL320 |
| Also called as | - | WB1000 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2010-08-19 | 2009-02-23 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/2.8-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 920k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | DB-100 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $211 | $380 |