Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung WB2200F
92 Imaging
34 Features
34 Overall
34
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Launched January 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
Below is a thorough analysis of the Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung WB2200F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the CX4 (10MP) and WB2200F (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe CX4 was launched 4 years earlier than the WB2200F and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a concise summary of how the CX4 scores against the WB2200F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh CX4 and Samsung WB2200F. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX4 Gallery and Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Samsung WB2200F
| CX4 | WB2200F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Ricoh CX4
| WB2200F | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 |  | August 2010 | More recent by 41 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX4 and Samsung WB2200F
| CX4 | WB2200F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh CX4 offers external measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung WB2200F has measurements of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") with a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung WB2200F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the CX4 against the WB2200F.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the CX4 and WB2200F is 92 and 59 respectively.
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to see the gap between sensor measurements only by looking at specifications. The visual below will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the CX4 and WB2200F.
Plainly, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Samsung WB2200F to give greater detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics more aggressively. The older CX4 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
| Ricoh CX4 | Samsung WB2200F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh CX4 | Samsung WB2200F |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-08-19 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 200k dots |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 1/8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 pounds) | 708 grams (1.56 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | DB-100 | BP-1410 |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $211 | $599 |
