Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung WB50F
92 Imaging
34 Features
34 Overall
34
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung WB50F Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung WB50F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the CX4 (10MP) and WB50F (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe CX4 was introduced 4 years before the WB50F and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the CX4 scores against the WB50F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh CX4 and Samsung WB50F. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh CX4 Gallery and Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Samsung WB50F
| CX4 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Ricoh CX4
| WB50F | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2014 |  | August 2010 | More recent by 41 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX4 and Samsung WB50F
| CX4 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh CX4 features external dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung WB50F has proportions of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") with a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
See the Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung WB50F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the CX4 versus the WB50F.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the CX4 and WB50F is 92 and 92 respectively.
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to see the difference in sensor measurements merely by checking out specs. The photograph below may provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX4 and WB50F.
All in all, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Samsung WB50F to provide more detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older CX4 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Ricoh CX4 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
| Ricoh CX4 | Samsung WB50F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh CX4 | Samsung WB50F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-08-19 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 pounds) | 207g (0.46 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | DB-100 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $211 | $180 |
