Clicky

Ricoh CX4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
92
Imaging
33
Features
34
Overall
33
Ricoh CX4 front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
63
Features
38
Overall
53

Ricoh CX4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Ricoh CX4
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
  • Revealed August 2010
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Launched February 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh CX4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

In this write-up, we will be matching up the Ricoh CX4 versus Sigma DP2 Quattro, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Sigma. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the CX4 (10MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the CX4 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) come with totally different sensor measurements.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The CX4 was brought out 4 years prior to the DP2 Quattro which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a concise view of how the CX4 matches up against the DP2 Quattro when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 CX4 DP2 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Ricoh CX4

 DP2 Quattro CX4 
LaunchedFebruary 2014August 2010More modern by 42 months

Common features in the Ricoh CX4 and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 CX4 DP2 Quattro 
Focus manually More accurate focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen measurements
Screen resolution920k920kThe same screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch screen Neither provides Touch screen

Ricoh CX4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to carry around your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The Ricoh CX4 provides physical measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP2 Quattro has proportions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

See the Ricoh CX4 versus Sigma DP2 Quattro in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the CX4 vs the DP2 Quattro.

Ricoh CX4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the CX4 and DP2 Quattro is 92 and 70 respectively.

Ricoh CX4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Ricoh CX4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizes merely by checking specifications. The pic underneath will give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the CX4 and DP2 Quattro.

To sum up, both of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The CX4 featuring a tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF more challenging and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will give you greater detail having its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged CX4 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Ricoh CX4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Ricoh CX4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh CX4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh CX4
Portrait photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
26
has manual focus
no manual exposure
no external flash support
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
77
you can focus manually
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
features face detect focus
saves RAW formats
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Ricoh CX4 Street photography features
Sigma DP2 Quattro Street photography features
60
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (205g)
screen is fixed
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
61
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Ricoh CX4 as a Sports photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Sports photography camera
24
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow fps (5.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
48
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
can't change focal length (45mm)
slow fps (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
does not have phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Ricoh CX4 as a Travel photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Travel photography camera
66
lighter than others in class (205g)
flash built-in
quite wide (28mm)
very long reach (300mm)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
does not posses selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
53
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh CX4 as a Landscape photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Landscape photography camera
42
has manual focus
quite wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
no manual exposure
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
59
you can focus manually
nice screen size (3 inches)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (45mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh CX4 Vlogging information
Sigma DP2 Quattro Vlogging information
30
quite wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (205 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not posses selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of mic socket
9
can't record video
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Ricoh CX4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh CX4 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Ricoh CX4Sigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Company Ricoh Sigma
Model type Ricoh CX4 Sigma DP2 Quattro
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Large Sensor Compact
Revealed 2010-08-19 2014-02-13
Physical type Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Smooth Imaging Engine IV TRUE III engine
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 5424 x 3616
Maximum native ISO 3200 6400
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points - 9
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-300mm (10.7x) 45mm (1x)
Maximal aperture f/3.5-5.6 f/2.8
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 920k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen technology - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 5.0 frames per second 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.00 m no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync no built-in flash
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 None
Video format Motion JPEG -
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 205g (0.45 lb) 395g (0.87 lb)
Dimensions 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID DB-100 BP-51
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal -
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $211 $931