Ricoh CX4 vs Sony NEX-F3
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
86 Imaging
57 Features
60 Overall
58
Ricoh CX4 vs Sony NEX-F3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 314g - 117 x 67 x 42mm
- Announced August 2012
- Older Model is Sony NEX-C3
- Successor is Sony NEX-3N
Ricoh CX4 vs Sony NEX-F3 Overview
Here is a comprehensive analysis of the Ricoh CX4 versus Sony NEX-F3, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Ricoh and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the CX4 (10MP) and NEX-F3 (16MP) and the CX4 (1/2.3") and NEX-F3 (APS-C) possess different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe CX4 was launched 24 months earlier than the NEX-F3 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-F3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise summary of how the CX4 scores vs the NEX-F3 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh CX4 vs Sony NEX-F3 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh CX4 & Sony Alpha NEX-F3. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh CX4 Gallery & Sony NEX-F3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Sony NEX-F3
CX4 | NEX-F3 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-F3 over the Ricoh CX4
NEX-F3 | CX4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2012 | August 2010 | Fresher by 24 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Ricoh CX4 and Sony NEX-F3
CX4 | NEX-F3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement | |
Display resolution | 920k | 920k | Same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Ricoh CX4 vs Sony NEX-F3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX4 features physical dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-F3 has sizing of 117mm x 67mm x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 314 grams (0.69 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh CX4 versus Sony NEX-F3 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the CX4 versus the NEX-F3.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the CX4 and NEX-F3 is 92 and 86 respectively.
Ricoh CX4 vs Sony NEX-F3 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizing just by seeing specifications. The visual below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX4 and NEX-F3.
Plainly, both the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The CX4 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh more challenging and the Sony NEX-F3 will provide extra detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images a little more aggressively. The older CX4 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh CX4 vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh CX4 vs Sony NEX-F3 Specifications
Ricoh CX4 | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh CX4 | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2010-08-19 | 2012-08-16 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4912 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 16000 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lbs) | 314 grams (0.69 lbs) |
Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 117 x 67 x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1114 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 470 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB-100 | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $211 | $470 |