Ricoh CX4 vs Sony a3500
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e742/4e74284e98f8a2f698e6b96487e93d8958a78f02" alt="Ricoh CX4 front Ricoh CX4 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a8dd/4a8dd561f31a1ef05032a3f55300768a5c6ad484" alt="Sony Alpha a3500 front Sony Alpha a3500 front"
69 Imaging
63 Features
54 Overall
59
Ricoh CX4 vs Sony a3500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 411g - 128 x 91 x 85mm
- Revealed March 2014
- Superseded the Sony A3000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Ricoh CX4 vs Sony a3500 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Ricoh CX4 vs Sony a3500, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the CX4 (10MP) and a3500 (20MP) and the CX4 (1/2.3") and a3500 (APS-C) use different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The CX4 was launched 4 years before the a3500 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera and the Sony a3500 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the CX4 scores vs the a3500 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Ricoh CX4 vs Sony a3500 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh CX4 & Sony Alpha a3500. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh CX4 Gallery & Sony a3500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Sony a3500
CX4 | a3500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony a3500 over the Ricoh CX4
a3500 | CX4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | March 2014 | ![]() | August 2010 | More modern by 43 months |
Common features in the Ricoh CX4 and Sony a3500
CX4 | a3500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh CX4 vs Sony a3500 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh CX4 enjoys outside dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Sony a3500 has sizing of 128mm x 91mm x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") with a weight of 411 grams (0.91 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh CX4 vs Sony a3500 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the CX4 and the a3500.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cba8d/cba8d6ba59cb9e6984cee90d184239c017cb35d2" alt="Ricoh CX4 vs Sony a3500 size comparison Ricoh CX4 vs Sony a3500 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the CX4 and a3500 is 92 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd5df/cd5df1c4aad2edf3295e6cde72c22089dfe61428" alt="Ricoh CX4 vs Sony a3500 top view buttons comparison Ricoh CX4 vs Sony a3500 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh CX4 vs Sony a3500 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizes purely by researching a spec sheet. The picture underneath should offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the CX4 and a3500.
As you can see, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The CX4 because of its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Sony a3500 will result in greater detail utilizing its extra 10MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged CX4 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2aeed/2aeed06fc03d76e55d0736556f5db31f70292b6a" alt="Ricoh CX4 vs Sony a3500 sensor size comparison Ricoh CX4 vs Sony a3500 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh CX4 vs Sony a3500 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9246a/9246ab0e608d5db1c5731c764ca3ff09e86c277c" alt="Ricoh CX4 vs Sony a3500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh CX4 vs Sony a3500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Ricoh CX4 vs Sony a3500 Specifications
Ricoh CX4 | Sony Alpha a3500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh CX4 | Sony Alpha a3500 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2010-08-19 | 2014-03-21 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | BIONZ image |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5456 x 3632 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 16000 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.47x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per sec | 4.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 6.00 m (at ISO200 / 4m at ISO100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Flash off, Auto flash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync. |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205 gr (0.45 pounds) | 411 gr (0.91 pounds) |
Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 128 x 91 x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 470 images |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB-100 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2-sec. or 10-sec. delay) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $211 | $398 |